clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

The big 2015 FAU football guide: Recruiting strong, now what about results?

The 128-team countdown takes on what's becoming one of the country's most talented mid-majors.

Robert Mayer-USA TODAY Sports

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.

1. The unsafe choice, one year in

Judging by the Owls' performance under [interim coach Brian] Wright [in 2013], it would have been understandable if FAU had just given him the full-time keys. His guidance of the program was better than his guidance of the offense, and with solid returning talent, he could have engineered a strong 2014. Granted, he only had a month of experience as FAU's head coach, but he proved quite a bit.

The Owls took a bigger risk, giving the job to 40-year-old Charlie Partridge. A Plantation, Fla., native, Partridge spent the last six years as a Bret Bielema assistant. He is known as an ace recruiter with all sorts of Florida ties, and he has backed up those claims by already locking down two high-profile commitments.

The odds are good that his recruiting ability will help build the Owls into one of the more purely athletic teams in Conference USA. What we don't know yet is whether he'll be able to coach.

In choosing a successor for Carl Pelini, FAU went after a high-ceiling, unknown-floor guy in Charlie Partridge. Brian Wright had engineered four straight wins and a 6-6 finish for the Owls in 2013, but bringing an ace recruiter to a school in Florida sounded like too much of an opportunity to pass up.

One year in, the jury's still out. The offense took a step forward, but the defense regressed, and the product did not match what the Owls were doing in late 2013. FAU was solid at home, whipping Tulsa, knocking off Western Kentucky and narrowly falling to two .500 teams (UAB, ODU). But the Owls were a horror show on the road and finished 3-9 as a result.

Heading into Year 2, Partridge will field a team that could be even more efficient on offense and even shakier on defense. He did sign the best non-Marshall recruiting class in Conference USA, so he lived up to the hype. And that will buy him plenty of time.

2. Scarlett fever

Conceptually, FAU's class was of particular interest because of a theory that began floating around a year ago. A couple of days after Christmas 2013, running back Jordan Scarlett, one of the premier running backs in the class of 2015, committed to Partridge and FAU. The response from recruiting analysts was two-pronged and nearly unanimous: 1) There's no chance Scarlett remains committed to FAU over the 13 months before Signing Day, and 2) this is still fantastic for FAU because Partridge and his staff now have "momentum" in South Florida. Scarlett's commitment could end up helping to secure other FAU commitments even if he eventually decommits.

To me, this felt dissonant. If recruits are taking FAU more seriously because of Scarlett's commitment, should we assume they will continue to take FAU seriously once he decommits? What kind of momentum are we really looking at if the source of the momentum doesn't end up playing in Boca Raton?

Sure enough, Scarlett didn't sign wih the Owls. He decommitted in June, committed to Miami in July, then flipped to Florida. But before Scarlett flipped, FAU scored commitments from three-star prospects Rodrick Archer (safety from Plantation, Fla.), Daniel Parr (quarterback from Palm Beach Gardens), Jaye Miner (linebacker from Wesley Chapel), Azeez Al-Shaair (linebacker from Tampa), Tavaris Harrison (receiver from North Miami Beach), and Tarrick Thomas (lineman from Tallahassee). They remained committed after Scarlett flipped, and FAU then proceeded to add another eight three-star signees, (according to the 247Sports Composite.

At the least, Scarlett's predictable decommitment didn't hurt FAU's efforts. If nothing else, perhaps Scarlett gave others a reason to take a look at FAU, and when they did, they liked what they saw. Partridge signed 247's No. 79 class in the country, one that ranked second in Conference USA and would have placed in the upper half of AAC. Not bad for a school that averaged 3.7 wins per season since 2015's signees entered junior high.

2014 Schedule & Results

Record: 3-9 | Adj. Record: 2-10 | Final F/+ Rk: 100
Date Opponent Opp. F/+ Rk Score W-L Percentile
Performance
Adj. Scoring
Margin
Win
Expectancy
30-Aug at Nebraska 30 7-55 L 6% -35.4 0%
6-Sep at Alabama 2 0-41 L 3% -43.3 0%
13-Sep Tulsa 117 50-21 W 87% 26.5 100%
20-Sep at Wyoming 113 19-20 L 31% -11.7 49%
27-Sep UTSA 109 41-37 W 33% -10.5 38%
2-Oct at Florida International 96 10-38 L 13% -25.8 4%
18-Oct Western Kentucky 50 45-38 W 70% 12.4 78%
25-Oct at Marshall 17 16-35 L 29% -12.7 0%
1-Nov UAB 79 28-31 L 49% -0.7 43%
8-Nov at North Texas 125 10-31 L 6% -36.2 0%
22-Nov at Middle Tennessee 87 34-35 L 42% -4.5 37%
29-Nov Old Dominion 108 28-31 L 46% -2.6 52%

Category Offense Rk Defense Rk
S&P+ 25.8 86 34.9 107
Points Per Game 24.0 97 34.4 110

3. No place like Boca Raton

In this year's UMass and Ohio previews, I talked about home-road splits as it pertains to percentile performances. This is still a new concept for me, something I created for this year's series. But it's been interesting to track. Some teams, like UMass (which played some of its games in mostly empty Gillette Stadium) had almost no split between home and road performances. Others, like Ohio, had enormous splits.

FAU's split was even larger than Ohio's.

  • Average Percentile Performance (away): 19% (record: 0-7)
  • Average Percentile Performance (home): 57% (record: 3-2)

At home, FAU played like one of the better teams in Conference USA. Against Tulsa, UTSA, WKU, UAB, and ODU, the Owls averaged 6.6 yards per play and allowed 5.4. They averaged 38.4 points per game and were a bit unlucky to allow 31.6.

On the road, FAU averaged 4.6 yards per play and allowed 6.9. Part of that disparity comes from the schedule, which featured by far the season's three best opponents (Nebraska, Alabama, Marshall) on the road. But the schedule-adjusted percentiles show us FAU was vastly inferior away from Boca Raton.

Maybe this is a sign of youth and a new coaching staff. I plan on diving further into these percentiles at some point, and maybe we'll see correlations among the teams with huge splits. Regardless, FAU was both young and awful outside of its own area code.

Offense

FIVE FACTORS -- OFFENSE
Raw Category Rk Opp. Adj. Category Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS IsoPPP 0.85 66 IsoPPP+ 93.1 85
EFFICIENCY Succ. Rt. 42.0% 59 Succ. Rt. + 98.7 73
FIELD POSITION Def. Avg. FP 30.5 79 Def. FP+ 101.0 53
FINISHING DRIVES Pts. Per Trip in 40 3.9 97 Redzone S&P+ 92.6 88
TURNOVERS EXPECTED 18.6 ACTUAL 18 -0.6
Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 103 83 73 85
RUSHING 62 81 80 77
PASSING 92 77 59 84
Standard Downs 72 71 71
Passing Downs 101 79 103
Q1 Rk 94 1st Down Rk 97
Q2 Rk 109 2nd Down Rk 76
Q3 Rk 99 3rd Down Rk 100
Q4 Rk 40

Quarterback

Note: players in bold below are 2015 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.

Player Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. Comp Att Yards TD INT Comp
Rate
Sacks Sack Rate Yards/
Att.
Jaquez Johnson 6'1, 225 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) NR 182 315 2215 17 5 57.8% 15 4.5% 6.5
Greg Hankerson 6'0, 185 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7826 23 48 163 1 0 47.9% 6 11.1% 2.1
Jason Driskel 6'2, 210 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8129
Daniel Parr 6'3, 190 Fr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8364

4. Jaquez vs. consistency

In 2013, Jaquez Johnson seized control of the quarterback job, rushed for 870 non-sack yards and completing 57 percent at an explosive 14.8 yards per completion. FAU's offense was increasingly vertical, and in the Owls' season-ending four-game win streak, they averaged 38 points despite a slow tempo.

Wright remained at FAU as offensive coordinator when Partridge was hired, but the big plays dried up. Explosive stars Jay Warren and William Dukes were held in check, leaving Johnson to move the ball with efficiency. At times he did this.

He got hurt against Nebraska and missed the Alabama game, but in his first three home games he completed 62 of 88 passes (70 percent) for 938 yards, nine touchdowns, and no picks. Against WKU, he threw for 325 yards and rushed for 95. Like the rest of the team, he was mostly awful away from home, but despite an overall lack of big plays, he still increased his per-attempt passing average (from 6.4 to 6.5) while cutting down his sack and interception rates and still rushing efficiently.

Johnson wasn't efficient enough for FAU to put up big numbers when the big plays weren't flowing in. His completion rate was at 64 percent or higher in four of 11 games, but it was 51 percent or lower in five. His senior season will be graded by how well he can maintain form.

Warren returns to the backfield, and there are recent star signees who could do damage at the skill positions. But his receiving corps will be awfully green, and that might make it difficult to improve.

Running Back

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. Rushes Yards TD Yards/
Carry
Hlt Yds/
Opp.
Opp.
Rate
Fumbles Fum.
Lost
Jay Warren RB 6'0, 195 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8356 121 571 2 4.7 4.8 35.5% 4 2
Jaquez Johnson QB 6'1, 225 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) NR 105 599 7 5.7 4.8 44.8% 4 3
Tony Moore RB
75 299 3 4.0 2.8 33.3% 1 1
Greg Howell RB 6'1, 205 So. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8233 50 253 1 5.1 3.3 44.0% 2 1
Lucky Whitehead WR
21 210 1 10.0 16.5 42.9% 5 4
Jeremy Gaskins RB 5'10, 190 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) 0.7564 19 55 0 2.9 2.5 31.6% 0 0
Martese Jackson RB
14 29 0 2.1 1.7 21.4% 0 0
Greg Hankerson QB 6'0, 185 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7826 7 41 0 5.9 4.9 42.9% 0 0
Henry Bussey RB 5'9, 180 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7556 7 29 0 4.1 1.1 71.4% 1 0
Trey Rodriguez RB 5'10, 185 Fr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8566






Receiving Corps

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. Targets Catches Yards Catch Rate Target
Rate
%SD Yds/
Target
NEY Real Yds/
Target
RYPR
Lucky Whitehead WR-W
106 76 709 71.7% 29.8% 58.5% 6.7 -192 6.7 92.1
Jenson Stoshak WR-X 6'1, 195 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) NR 65 38 511 58.5% 18.3% 76.9% 7.9 43 8.5 66.4
Alex Deleon TE
46 23 295 50.0% 12.9% 65.2% 6.4 2 6.9 38.3
William Dukes WR-Z
38 15 259 39.5% 10.7% 68.4% 6.8 56 6.6 33.7
Kalib Woods WR-Z 6'3, 182 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8300 31 16 223 51.6% 8.7% 67.7% 7.2 21 6.6 28.9
Derek Moise WR 6'2, 195 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) 0.7600 21 10 74 47.6% 5.9% 52.4% 3.5 -55 3.8 9.6
Nate Terry TE 6'6, 210 So. 2 stars (5.3) 0.7000 9 3 55 33.3% 2.5% 33.3% 6.1 12 8.1 7.1
Jay Warren RB 6'0, 195 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8356 8 4 26 50.0% 2.2% 25.0% 3.3 -25 2.5 3.4
Henry Bussey RB 5'9, 180 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7556 6 4 88 66.7% 1.7% 16.7% 14.7 40 7.0 11.4
Tony Moore RB
5 3 43 60.0% 1.4% 0.0% 8.6 6 N/A 5.6
Kamrin Solomon WR 6'2, 196 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7882 3 2 28 66.7% 0.8% 66.7% 9.3 4 9.7 3.6
Michael Harrop TE 6'3, 220 Sr. NR NR 2 1 12 50.0% 0.6% 50.0% 6.0 -1 6.9 1.6
Dustin Bowens TE 6'5, 255 So. 2 stars (5.2) 0.7900
Bobby Mitchell WR 6'2, 175 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8156
Chandler Dexter TE 6'5, 255 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 0.7600
Ralph Leonard WR 6'2, 182 Fr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8256
Tavaris Harrison WR 6'3, 166 Fr. 2 stars (5.2) 0.8169
Ladante Harris WR 5'10, 160 Fr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7932

5. Find some receivers (and hold onto the damn ball)

Because of sacks, most quarterbacks end up fumbling at least four or five times per season. So Johnson's four gaffes weren't too bad. But Jay Warren fumbled once every 30 carries, and leading receiver Lucky Whitehead managed to fumble five times in 97 catches/carries. And they didn't back those mistakes up with nearly enough big plays.

Whitehead will still be missed after a stellar season as a possession man; he caught 19 passes for 227 yards against WKU and Marshall, and he provided a needed efficiency option: while his catch rate was a lovely 72 percent, the next seven targets combined for a catch rate of 50.0 percent, and that includes two tight ends and a running back.

Johnson will be without Whitehead, leading tight end Alex Deleon, and all-or-nothing receiver William Dukes. He does get back last year's most successful per-target receiver, Jenson Stoshak. But after Stoshak comes a cavalcade of high-ceiling guys who have yet to prove much: sophomore Kalib Woods, redshirt freshman Bobby Mitchell, true freshmen Ralph Leonard and Tavaris Harrison.

Athleticism won't be an issue, and if those touching the ball can hold onto it, that would be great.

Offensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs

LY/carry
Pass.
Downs

LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs

Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs

Sack Rt.
Team 103.3 3.11 3.55 38.9% 63.4% 17.1% 150.1 3.5% 5.3%
Rank 60 42 40 71 96 36 18 33 32
Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. Career Starts Honors/Notes
Braden Lyons RT 24
Dillon DeBoer RG 6'6, 295 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7000 18
Mikingson Marsaille LG 6'6, 320 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) 0.7600 14
Reggie Bain LT 6'4, 286 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7856 12
Joe Gold C 6'3, 270 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8056 6
Eric Minemyer RT
6
Jakobi Smith RG 6'3, 300 So. NR 0.7500 1
Arthur Crouse LT 6'6, 250 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 0.7000 0
Roman Fernandez LG 6'0, 305 So. NR NR 0
Antonyo Woods RG 6'3, 285 So. NR NR 0
Austin Bland OL 6'3, 265 So. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8407 0
Siffo Pierre OL 6'4, 325 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7000
Kelly Parfitt (UCF) OL 6'6, 313 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8044
Tarrick Thomas OL 6'4, 270 Fr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8503
Bryan Beck OL 6'5, 275 Fr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7583

6. An underrated front

The running game didn't produce nearly as many big plays in 2014 (12 rushes of 20-plus yards, 96th in FBS) as 2013 (20, 45th). But it was able to consistently gain four to five yards. The line played a role, and it helped in keeping Johnson's sack rates pretty low despite his dual-threat nature. (Dual-threats tend to have higher sack rates because they trust their legs to make too many plays.)

The return of five players with starting experience (51 career starts) is unquestionably a good thing. The line did its job despite three freshmen getting starting experience, and adding UCF transfer Kelly Parfitt to the rotation, along with (perhaps) star recruit Tarrick Thomas, should create one of the conference's best lines. And if you have a good line, an exciting quarterback, and an experienced starting running back, you can move the ball.

Defense

FIVE FACTORS -- DEFENSE
Raw Category Rk Opp. Adj. Category Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS IsoPPP 0.88 86 IsoPPP+ 92.3 91
EFFICIENCY Succ. Rt. 45.9% 109 Succ. Rt. + 92.3 101
FIELD POSITION Off. Avg. FP 29.7 77 Off. FP+ 98.0 88
FINISHING DRIVES Pts. Per Trip in 40 4.9 114 Redzone S&P+ 88.1 112
TURNOVERS EXPECTED 17.3 ACTUAL 15.0 -2.3
Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 113 99 99 91
RUSHING 114 114 117 113
PASSING 87 54 52 50
Standard Downs 97 100 92
Passing Downs 91 83 88
Q1 Rk 119 1st Down Rk 94
Q2 Rk 89 2nd Down Rk 102
Q3 Rk 68 3rd Down Rk 105
Q4 Rk 82

Defensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs

LY/carry
Pass.
Downs

LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs

Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs

Sack Rt.
Team 87.8 3.34 3.96 42.4% 63.5% 12.5% 91.1 3.5% 8.6%
Rank 113 116 122 102 44 127 85 91 43
Name Pos Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Trevon Coley DT 6'2, 300 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8125 12 37.0 5.3% 6.5 4.0 1 1 0 0
Trey Hendrickson DE 6'4, 250 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7956 12 24.5 3.5% 8.5 5.0 0 1 1 0
Robinson Eugene DE 6'5, 266 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 0.7000 12 18.5 2.7% 3.0 2.0 0 0 0 0
Haiden Nagel DE 6'4, 230 So. 2 stars (5.3) NR 11 16.0 2.3% 2.0 2.0 0 1 0 0
Shalom Ogbonda DE 6'4, 290 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8157 11 14.0 2.0% 0.5 0.0 0 1 0 0
Joe Henry DE
7 12.0 1.7% 3.0 2.0 0 0 0 0
Denzel Whitfield DT 6'5, 260 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7000 12 12.0 1.7% 1.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Ray Ellis DT 6'1, 260 So. 2 stars (5.3) 0.7444 6 11.0 1.6% 1.0 1.0 0 0 0 0
Brandin Bryant DT 6'3, 290 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.7000 5 9.5 1.4% 2.5 2.0 0 0 1 0
Derek Butcher DT
11 6.0 0.9% 2.0 1.0 0 1 0 0
Josh Ballesteros DE 6'2, 210 Jr. 2 stars (5.3) 0.7751 5 5.0 0.7% 1.0 1.0 0 0 0 0
Josh Kendall DT 6'2, 269 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7593







7. Dreadful against the run

A shaky front seven can threaten even the best secondary; if there's a minimal pass rush, or if the front is getting gashed for seven yards per carry, the defensive backs won't get many opportunities to dominate. But with competence up front, the FAU secondary could be just as effective as it was in 2013 in this 4-2-5 structure. [...]

This is one of the best defensive backfields in mid-major football. It might be the best.

To say the least, I was bullish on FAU's secondary last year, and I had reason for it. Despite horrific rush defense and a mediocre pass rush, FAU managed a No. 54 ranking in Passing S&P+. That says wonderful things about the defensive backs.

But my caveat -- "with competence up front..." -- rang true. FAU ranked 114th in Rushing S&P+, 113th in Adj. Line Yards, and 127th in Stuff Rate (run stops at or behind the line). A good pass defense only matters if you can pretend to stop the run.

Because experience so frequently leads to good play, it is frequently the case that teams return players from weak units while replacing key pieces from good units. Such is life for FAU: eight of the top nine tacklers from last year's line return, while three of the top five in the secondary are gone.

Outside of Trevon Coley, FAU couldn't figure out its tackle situation, so if another year helps to set a rotation, that can only help. But the Owls had only one disruptive presence against the run (linebacker Andrae Kirk), and he's the player FAU has to replace. Improvement isn't guaranteed.

Linebackers

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Andrae Kirk LB
12 77.5 11.1% 10.5 2.0 2 8 1 0
Robert Relf LB 6'3, 220 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.7991 11 44.5 6.4% 1.5 0.0 0 0 0 0
Jerrad Ward LB 6'0, 215 So. 2 stars (5.2) NR 10 20.5 2.9% 1.0 0.0 0 1 0 0
David Lozandier LB
6 13.5 1.9% 1.0 1.0 0 1 0 0
Nate Ozdemir LB 6'2, 230 So. 2 stars (5.4) NR 10 11.0 1.6% 0.5 0.0 0 0 0 0
Freedom Whitfield LB 6'2, 200 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7600 9 9.0 1.3% 1.5 0.0 0 0 0 0
Kris Harris LB 6'0, 225 RSFr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8322
Jaye Miner LB 6'3, 190 Fr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8438
Azeez Al-Shaair LB 6'1, 215 Fr. 2 stars (5.2) 0.8005








Secondary

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Damian Parms SS
12 67.0 9.6% 3 0 0 1 1 0
Cre'von LeBlanc CB 5'11, 175 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8157 12 63.0 9.1% 1 0 2 6 0 0
Christian Milstead FS
12 47.5 6.8% 1 0 0 7 0 0
Sharrod Neasman NB 6'0, 198 Sr. NR NR 12 46.0 6.6% 3 0 2 3 1 0
D'Joun Smith CB
11 43.5 6.3% 3 0 1 8 2 1
Raekwon Williams CB 5'11, 174 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7000 12 24.0 3.4% 0 0 0 2 0 0
Anthony Hamilton DB 5'10, 190 Jr. 2 stars (5.3) NR 11 17.5 2.5% 0 0 0 1 0 0
Grant Helm SS
12 15.0 2.2% 1 0 0 0 0 0
Reggie Brown CB 5'11, 170 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7906 2 5.0 0.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marc Mauro SS
3 3.5 0.5% 0 0 0 1 0 0
Ron Henderson DB 5'10, 180 Sr. NR NR 2 3.0 0.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lester Thomas DB 5'10, 165 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7759 7 2.0 0.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marquese Dudley-Gordon S 6'0, 188 RSFr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8423
Jake Stoshak DB 6'0, 180 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8006
Jalen Young S 5'11, 175 Fr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8423
Rodrick Archer S 6'1, 190 Fr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8342
Gerald Robinson Jr. CB 5'11, 180 Fr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8282
Richie Kittles Jr. S 5'11, 175 Fr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8134
Ocie Rose S 6'0, 167 Fr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8220
Shelton Lewis CB 6'0, 171 Fr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8217
Kemar Downer DB 5'11, 170 Fr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8173
Herbert Miller S 6'1, 185 Fr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8061

8. Building a 1-1-9 defense

FAU signed a load of three-star recruits, which can only mean good things. But there was a bit too much repetition in terms of positioning. Of the 10 incoming freshman defenders given a three-star designation by 247Sports, eight are defensive backs. For a team that operates out of a nickel, that's not as disproportionate as it may sound ... but it's still disproportionate.

Losing both safeties and cornerback D'Joun Smith will almost certainly lead to regression. But between corner Cre'von LeBlanc, nickel back Sharrod Neasman, and sophomore Raekwon Williams, there's reason to hope the dropoff is minimal. And with two three-star redshirt freshmen joining the eight three-star trues, there's reason to assume FAU will soon have one of the league's best secondaries for years.

If defensive coordinator Roc Bellantoni can figure out how to fix the front of the defense, the back should be fine ... eventually.

Special Teams

Punter Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Punts Avg TB FC I20 FC/I20
Ratio
Dalton Schomp 6'1, 215 Jr. 50 45.4 1 12 8 40.0%
Ryan Rickel 6'0, 170 Jr. 17 36.1 4 7 10 100.0%
Kicker Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Kickoffs Avg TB OOB TB%
Greg Joseph 6'1, 205 Jr. 57 60.5 22 0 38.6%
Kieran Leen 3 58.0 1 1 33.3%
Place-Kicker Ht, Wt 2015
Year
PAT FG
(0-39)
Pct FG
(40+)
Pct
Greg Joseph 6'1, 205 Jr. 34-35 10-13 76.9% 4-7 57.1%
Returner Pos. Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Returns Avg. TD
Lucky Whitehead KR 20 24.7 0
D'Joun Smith KR 17 26.3 0
Lucky Whitehead PR 19 16.4 1
Cre'von LeBlanc PR 5'11, 175 Sr. 3 2.7 0
Category Rk
Special Teams F/+ 48
Field Goal Efficiency 84
Punt Return Efficiency 31
Kick Return Efficiency 84
Punt Efficiency 17
Kickoff Efficiency 96
Opponents' Field Goal Efficiency 109

9. Lucky was a hell of a return man

Despite the fumble issues, Lucky Whitehead's punt returns made him one of FAU's most dangerous weapons. Losing him might hurt the special teams unit more than it hurts the offense. His returns and the punting duo of Dalton Schomp and Ryan Rickel propped FAU's special teams ratings. The punters are back, but regression in the return game could hurt.

2015 Schedule & Projection Factors

2015 Schedule
Date Opponent 2014 F/+ Rk
5-Sep at Tulsa 117
12-Sep Miami 31
19-Sep Buffalo 114
26-Sep at Charlotte NR
10-Oct Rice 86
17-Oct Marshall 17
24-Oct at UTEP 90
31-Oct Florida International 96
7-Nov at Western Kentucky 50
14-Nov Middle Tennessee 87
21-Nov at Florida 32
28-Nov at Old Dominion 108
Five-Year F/+ Rk -30.1% (118)
2- and 5-Year Recruiting Rk 82 / 94
2014 TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* -3 / -1.2
2014 TO Luck/Game -0.7
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) 14 (7, 7)
2014 Second-order wins (difference) 4.0 (-1.0)

10. Start strong

FAU will be experienced at quarterback and in the trenches and young as hell at receiver and defensive back. Considering how important pass defense was to the Owls' 2014 success (such as it was), that might mean that improvement is minimal, though I would assume this is destined to be a team much better in November than it is in September.

The wins could come in September, though. FAU plays four teams that ranked 108th or worse in F/+ last season, but three pop up in the first four games of the year (and two are on the road). If the Owls start slow or play as poorly away from home as they did last year, they might be destined for another 3-9 campaign.

But if an experienced backbone means FAU is ready to do early damage, the Owls could threaten for six wins despite playing one of the league's tougher schedules. That makes the very first game of the season, a trip to Tulsa, important and telling.

As long as Partridge recruits like this, he'll be given plenty of leeway. But without eventual results, recruiting gets difficult. It's hard to produce one without the other.