The big 2015 Rice football guide: Exciting, glitchy, and pretty good (again)

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.

1. Cruising altitude

David Bailiff enjoys himself. I'm not sure there's an angry picture of him in existence, at least when he's standing on a football field. They're all relaxed, jovial, or fired up. Case in point:

Chuck Cook-USA TODAY Sports

Bob Levey-Getty Images

Brendan Maloney-USA TODAY Sports

Marco Garcia-USA TODAY Sports

Tim Heitman-USA TODAY Sports

Bailiff has been coaching since almost the moment he graduated from Southwest Texas State in 1981. He became a branch on Dennis Franchione's tree in 1990, became Gary Patterson's defensive coordinator at TCU when Franchione left for Alabama, and became a head coach in 2004, leading his alma mater for three seasons before taking over at Rice in 2007. The 56-year-old has lived pretty good to date.

Life's gotten better recently, though. When he came to Rice, Todd Graham had just pulled his "leave as soon as you arrive" routine, taking over for Ken Hatfield in 2006, going 7-6 (a six-win improvement over 2005), and leaving for Tulsa in 2007. Bailiff didn't add to the stability early on. Rice's win totals from 2005-09: 1, 7, 3, 10, 2. Bailiff engineered a Texas Bowl win in 2008, the Owls' first bowl victory since the 1954 Cotton Bowl, then oversaw a systemic collapse.

Rice ranked 49th in the F/+ ratings in 2008, plummeted to 118th in 2009, then picked up the pieces: 100th in 2010, 99th in 2011, 4-8 both years. Still, when Rice began 2012 by losing six of eight, it looked like the beginning of the end. The Owls were 12-32 since the Texas Bowl victory, and an experienced squad was failing to peak.

Since losing, 28-24, to eventual Conference USA champion Tulsa in 2012, Rice is 24-9. The Owls won the final five games of 2012, eking out bowl eligibility and thumping Air Force. They then thumped Marshall to win Conference USA in 2013, and after losing offensive difference-makers, they began 2014 0-3 and finished 8-2 with a bowl romp over Fresno State.

Bailiff teams finish strong. They click in November, and they bowl in December. Rice has attended as many bowls under Bailiff (four) as it had in the 53 years before he arrived and has won as many bowls as it had in the previous 69. This isn't a powerhouse program, but it is turning into one of Conference USA's safest bets.

Rice! A steady winner! In football! The school is investing in football, and if Louisiana Tech's defense regresses more than Rice's, Bailiff's Owls might have a shot at another conference title.

2014 Schedule & Results

Record: 8-5 | Adj. Record: 8-5 | Final F/+ Rk: 86
Date	Opponent	Opp. F/+ Rk	Score	W-L	Percentile Performance	Adj. Scoring Margin	Win Expectancy
30-Aug	at Notre Dame	34	17-48	L	4%	-40.7	0%
13-Sep	at Texas A&M	42	10-38	L	8%	-32.6	0%
20-Sep	Old Dominion	108	42-45	L	18%	-21.3	12%
27-Sep	at Southern Miss	110	41-23	W	63%	7.8	98%
4-Oct	Hawaii	111	28-14	W	64%	8.1	97%
11-Oct	at Army	121	41-21	W	80%	19.4	100%
25-Oct	North Texas	125	41-21	W	71%	12.6	97%
1-Nov	at Florida International	96	31-17	W	80%	19.8	99%
8-Nov	UTSA	109	17-7	W	57%	4.4	89%
15-Nov	at Marshall	17	14-41	L	17%	-22.7	0%
21-Nov	UTEP	90	31-13	W	85%	24.1	99%
29-Nov	at Louisiana Tech	35	31-76	L	7%	-35.4	0%
24-Dec	vs. Fresno State	102	30-6	W	90%	30.6	100%

Category	Offense	Rk	Defense	Rk
S&P+	29.1	62	30.6	83
Points Per Game	28.8	66	28.5	82

2. Good against bad

Rice is the third straight team we've previewed, joining UTEP and MTSU, that saved its best performances for its worst opponents and got pummeled by the good ones.

• Average Percentile Performance (vs. F/+ top 50): 9% (record: 0-4 | avg. score: Opponent 51, Rice 18)
• Average Percentile Performance (vs. everyone else): 68% (record: 8-1 | avg. score: Rice 34, Opponent 19)

The offense was strangely consistent -- 5.6 yards per play against Notre Dame, 5.6 against Southern Miss, 5.9 against North Texas, 5.2 against Louisiana Tech -- but the defense wasn't capable of slowing down strong offensive attacks. The Owls played five offenses in the Off. S&P+ top 60 and eight that ranked worse than 85th. The difference was stark.

• Rice Defense (vs. Off. S&P+ top 60): 8.38 yards per play, 49.6 points per game
• Rice Defense (vs. everyone else): 4.07 yards per play, 15.3 points per game

Now, you expect a defense to do better against bad offenses, but these numbers go well beyond that. If Rice could craft an athleticism advantage on defense, the Owls completely dominated. But against offenses with a pulse, they were doomed. They held Hawaii, North Texas, FIU, and Fresno State all under four yards per play, but they couldn't keep Notre Dame and Louisiana Tech under nine per play. That's startling.

That an athleticism advantage was important is a scary thing because most of Rice's most athletic defenders are gone: ends Brian Nordstrom and Zach Patt (combined: 31 tackles for loss, 17 sacks), tackles Dylan Klare and Christian Covington, linebacker James Radcliffe, corner Bryce Callahan, safeties Jaylon Finner and Julius White. The defense is rebuilding, and it already had some question marks.

Offense

FIVE FACTORS -- OFFENSE
	Raw Category		Rk	Opp. Adj. Category		Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS	IsoPPP	0.94	22	IsoPPP+	102.6	63
EFFICIENCY	Succ. Rt.	41.3%	68	Succ. Rt. +	97.2	77
FIELD POSITION	Def. Avg. FP	29.9	69	Def. FP+	101.0	53
FINISHING DRIVES	Pts. Per Trip in 40	4.5	52	Redzone S&P+	98.6	67
TURNOVERS	EXPECTED	15.6		ACTUAL	12	-3.6

Category	Yards/ Game Rk	S&P+ Rk	Success Rt. Rk	PPP+ Rk
OVERALL	68	67	77	63
RUSHING	59	99	100	101
PASSING	63	35	41	28
Standard Downs		96	97	87
Passing Downs		21	35	17

Q1 Rk	78	1st Down Rk	76
Q2 Rk	69	2nd Down Rk	92
Q3 Rk	84	3rd Down Rk	56
Q4 Rk	62

Quarterback

Note: players in bold below are 2015 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.

Player	Ht, Wt	2015 Year	Rivals	247 Comp.	Comp	Att	Yards	TD	INT	Comp Rate	Sacks	Sack Rate	Yards/ Att.
Driphus Jackson	6'0, 210	Sr.	3 stars (5.6)	0.7000	191	331	2842	24	8	57.7%	27	7.5%	7.5
Tyler Stehling	6'5, 215	Jr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.8000	12	19	159	1	0	63.2%	1	5.0%	7.7
Nate German	6'2, 215	So.	2 stars (5.4)	0.8038
J.T. Granato	6'3, 210	Fr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.8373
Jackson Tyner	6'4, 225	Fr.	2 stars (5.3)	0.8199

3. Trusting Driphus

Bailiff has lost offensive assistants (usually to bigger jobs), but his offense's philosophy has remained similar: run a lot on standard downs, run a lot on passing downs.

In 2012, with Taylor McHargue at quarterback, the Owls ran 3 percent more than the national average on standard downs and 13 percent more on passing downs. In 2013, it was 9 percent and 14 percent.

But after a two-year internship, Driphus Jackson took over, and with new offensive co-coordinators (veteran Bailiff assistants Larry Edmondson and Billy Lynch), the Owls ran more than ever on standard downs (71 percent, 11 percent above the average) but threw far more on second- or third-and-long.

With Jackson's mobility serving as a threat on the boundaries, Edmondson and Lynch asked him to make plays, and he did. The run game wasn't particularly strong -- leading rushers Jowan Davis and Darik Dillard combined to average 4.2 yards with almost no huge plays -- and Rice ranked just 96th in Standard Downs S&P+. But they ranked 21st on passing downs thanks to Jackson's play-making ability and a foursome of exciting receivers.

Jackson takes a lot of sacks, as do most mobile, get-him-on-the-perimeter QBs. But he makes smart decisions with the ball, he doesn't fumble, and he keeps Rice ahead of the chains. Watching him develop, from a star turn in the 2012 Armed Forces Bowl to another dominant performance against Fresno State in Hawaii, has been a lot of fun. He's tough (he separated his non-throwing shoulder against ODU, popped it back in, and kept playing), and he's ready for a big year, at least as long as a new big-play threat can emerge.

Running Back

Player	Pos.	Ht, Wt	2015 Year	Rivals	247 Comp.	Rushes	Yards	TD	Yards/ Carry	Hlt Yds/ Opp.	Opp. Rate	Fumbles	Fum. Lost
Jowan Davis	RB	5'7, 200	Jr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7893	245	956	6	3.9	3.5	33.9%	2	1
Darik Dillard	RB	5'10, 205	Jr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7826	134	652	11	4.9	3.9	38.1%	0	0
Driphus Jackson	QB	6'0, 210	Sr.	3 stars (5.6)	0.7000	94	556	1	5.9	5.2	47.9%	2	0
Brandon Hamilton	RB	5'11, 210	Jr.	3 stars (5.6)	0.8207	24	92	1	3.8	1.6	37.5%	2	0
Luke Turner	RB	6'1, 230	Sr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.8200	23	94	3	4.1	8.3	21.7%	0	0
Tyler Stehling	QB	6'5, 215	Jr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.8000	7	4	0	0.6	1.8	57.1%	1	0
Samuel Stewart	RB	5'9, 200	RSFr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.8485
Nahshon Ellerbe	RB	5'9, 190	Fr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.8104

4. A loaded backfield

Last year's backfield returns intact, from Jackson to every primary running back. The offensive line might be a question mark, as it must replace three starters, but there are juniors, seniors, and some former three-star recruits (sophomore Kenneth Thompson, for instance) ready to fill in.

In terms of returning personnel, there's no reason to think Rice won't still be run-heavy on first down. But I'm curious about the ball distribution.

Jowan Davis looked great early in the year (53 carries, 281 yards against ODU and Southern Miss) but averaged 3.6 yards per carry over the final nine games. Darik Dillard had a wonderful three-game span against Hawaii, Army, and North Texas (45 carries, 294 yards), then stumbled. Luke Turner had six carries for 42 yards against Fresno State. And two three-star youngsters (redshirt freshman Samuel Stewart, true freshman Nahshon Ellerbe) are waiting their turn.

Bailiff and his staff are confident enough in these backs that they are tinkering with new positions for a pair of three-star redshirt freshmen (Austin Walter is apparently moving to slot receiver, and his twin brother Aston is trying out at cornerback), but is there a go-to guy? And while Jackson is awesome on passing downs, can the run game prevent him from having to do quite as much?

Receiving Corps

Player	Pos.	Ht, Wt	2015 Year	Rivals	247 Comp.	Targets	Catches	Yards	Catch Rate	Target Rate	%SD	Yds/ Target	NEY	Real Yds/ Target	RYPR
Jordan Taylor	WR					82	54	842	65.9%	24.5%	59.8%	10.3	192	10.3	116.9
Dennis Parks	WR	6'2, 195	Sr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.7967	57	29	389	50.9%	17.0%	50.9%	6.8	21	6.9	54.0
Mario Hull	WR					55	32	621	58.2%	16.4%	45.5%	11.3	226	11.6	86.2
Zach Wright	WR	6'1, 200	Jr.	NR	NR	41	25	299	61.0%	12.2%	48.8%	7.3	-6	7.0	41.5
Darik Dillard	RB	5'10, 205	Jr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7826	21	17	163	81.0%	6.3%	28.6%	7.8	-34	9.6	22.6
James Mayden	WR	6'2, 190	So.	2 stars (5.3)	0.7685	17	7	229	41.2%	5.1%	52.9%	13.5	135	13.6	31.8
Luke Turner	RB	6'1, 230	Sr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.8200	14	10	122	71.4%	4.2%	42.9%	8.7	3	9.6	16.9
Jowan Davis	RB	5'7, 200	Jr.	2 stars	0.7893	14	13	108	92.9%	4.2%	71.4%	7.7	-40	7.0	15.0
Robby Wells III	TE	6'6, 250	Jr.	2 stars	0.7993	9	3	45	33.3%	2.7%	66.7%	5.0	2	4.5	6.2
Temi Alaka	WR	6'2, 200	So.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7993	7	4	56	57.1%	2.1%	42.9%	8.0	7	9.0	7.8
Cole Hunt	TE	6'5, 250	So.	3 stars (5.6)	0.8131	6	4	47	66.7%	1.8%	66.7%	7.8	-1	7.3	6.5
Darrion Pollard	WR	5'8, 190	Jr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.8100	5	2	24	40.0%	1.5%	20.0%	4.8	-3	2.5	3.3
Cameron Decell	WR	6'5, 210	Jr.	2 stars (5.3)	0.7300	3	2	41	66.7%	0.9%	0.0%	13.7	17	N/A	5.7
Connor Cella	TE	6'3, 255	Jr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7859	3	1	5	33.3%	0.9%	66.7%	1.7	-9	2.1	0.7
Reid Mitchell	TE	6'2, 240	Jr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.8150
Austin Walter	WR	5'7, 190	RSFr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.8250
Parker Smith	WR	6'3, 200	RSFr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7956
Jeremy Jones	WR	6'5, 205	RSFr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.8274

5. The big-play guys are gone

The line is the biggest question, but replacing Jordan Taylor and Mario Hull won't be the easiest thing in the world. Dennis Parks and Zach Wright were solid possession receivers, but at a combined 17.0 yards per catch, Taylor and Hull were the big-play guys.

James Mayden made an impression in limited opportunities -- he caught only seven passes, but three went for 53, 81, and 69 yards -- and going by 247Sports Composite ratings, there are a few different three-star options here. Odds are good that Jackson will have the weapons, but that's not 100 percent.

Offensive Line

Category	Adj. Line Yds	Std. Downs LY/carry	Pass. Downs LY/carry	Opp. Rate	Power Success Rate	Stuff Rate	Adj. Sack Rate	Std. Downs Sack Rt.	Pass. Downs Sack Rt.
Team	92.4	2.62	3.59	37.2%	72.9%	20.6%	87.4	5.4%	9.0%
Rank	102	106	38	86	26	82	85	81	88

Player	Pos.	Ht, Wt	2015 Year	Rivals	247 Comp.	Career Starts	Honors/Notes
Nico Carlson	LG					38	2014 2nd All-CUSA
Caleb Williams	RT	6'3, 295	Sr.	2 stars (5.3)	0.7000	39
Andrew Reue	RG	6'5, 295	Sr.	2 stars (5.3)	0.7000	26
Ian Gray	LT					16
Matt Simonette	C					13
Spencer Stanley	C	6'3, 290	Jr.	2 stars (5.3)	0.7833	1
John Poehlmann	RT	6'6, 295	Sr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.7000	0
Brandon Dawkins	LT	6'7, 310	Jr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.8019	0
Kenneth Thompson	LG	6'4, 285	So.	3 stars (5.5)	0.8423	0
Peter Godber	RG	6'3, 300	So.	2 stars (5.3)	0.7895	0
Trey Martin	C	6'2, 280	So.	2 stars (5.3)	0.7719	0
Hunter Ponder	OL	6'4, 260	So.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7893	0
Sam Pierce	OL	6'6, 300	RSFr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7893
Cory Klingler	OL	6'4, 300	RSFr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7959
Isaiah Edwards	OL	6'6, 380	Fr.	2 stars (5.3)	0.8140
Crockett Mokry	OL	6'4, 320	Fr.	2 stars (5.3)	0.7685

Defense

FIVE FACTORS -- DEFENSE
	Raw Category		Rk	Opp. Adj. Category		Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS	IsoPPP	0.94	110	IsoPPP+	89.3	103
EFFICIENCY	Succ. Rt.	41.0%	63	Succ. Rt. +	94.1	92
FIELD POSITION	Off. Avg. FP	31.5	34	Off. FP+	101.0	51
FINISHING DRIVES	Pts. Per Trip in 40	4.8	105	Redzone S&P+	95.2	84
TURNOVERS	EXPECTED	24.3		ACTUAL	20.0	-4.3

Category	Yards/ Game Rk	S&P+ Rk	Success Rt. Rk	PPP+ Rk
OVERALL	55	97	89	103
RUSHING	46	84	98	81
PASSING	79	106	87	113
Standard Downs		58	63	65
Passing Downs		121	120	122

Q1 Rk	99	1st Down Rk	90
Q2 Rk	90	2nd Down Rk	81
Q3 Rk	97	3rd Down Rk	102
Q4 Rk	36

6. Changing the script

Rice was great against bad offenses and horrific against good ones, but no matter what, the Owls' aggression forced opponents to change the script. Rice attacked the run enough on standard downs that opponents chose to pass 44 percent of the time, 4 percent more than the national average. On passing downs, Rice went after the quarterback enough that opponents ran 3 percent more than average.

Opponents had to counterpunch to find success. That worked out just fine for some, but most Conference USA offenses struggled to cope.

Bailiff and defensive coordinator Chris Thurmond might have to play it more conservatively. They no longer have a spectacular pass-rushing duo, defensive tackle depth, or experience in the secondary. It will be interesting to see if they change their level of aggression, or if they start by attacking as much, then making adjustments as results dictate.

Defensive Line

Category	Adj. Line Yds	Std. Downs LY/carry	Pass. Downs LY/carry	Opp. Rate	Power Success Rate	Stuff Rate	Adj. Sack Rate	Std. Downs Sack Rt.	Pass. Downs Sack Rt.
Team	91.8	2.82	3.68	40.9%	63.2%	18.4%	141.7	7.0%	11.7%
Rank	99	48	101	90	41	78	10	23	11

Name	Pos	Ht, Wt	2015 Year	Rivals	247 Comp.	GP	Tackles	% of Team	TFL	Sacks	Int	PBU	FF	FR
Brian Nordstrom	DE					13	43.5	6.6%	19.5	7.5	0	3	1	0
Zach Patt	DE					10	28.5	4.3%	11.5	9.5	0	2	3	0
Stuart Mouchantaf (2013)	DT	6'4, 290	Sr.	2 stars (5.3)	N/A	8	26.0	3.6%	3.0	0.0	0	0	0	0
Dylan Klare	DT					13	22.0	3.4%	8.0	5.0	0	1	0	0
Graysen Schantz	DE	6'3, 240	So.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7893	11	18.5	2.8%	7.0	3.0	0	0	2	0
Christian Covington	DT					7	17.0	2.6%	3.5	2.5	0	1	0	0
Trey Martin	NT	6'2, 285	So.	2 stars (5.3)	0.7719	11	14.0	2.1%	1.0	0.0	0	0	0	0
Grant Peterson	DE	6'6, 250	Sr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.7000	13	8.0	1.2%	3.0	2.5	0	1	0	0
Ross Winship	NT	6'4, 290	Sr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.7000	12	7.5	1.1%	2.0	0.0	0	2	0	0
Cody Henessee	DT	6'2, 265	Jr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.7800	9	6.5	1.0%	1.5	0.0	0	0	0	0
Brian Womac	DE	6'3, 240	So.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7954	6	5.0	0.8%	1.0	1.0	0	1	0	0
Connor Johnson	DE	6'2, 240	So.	NR	NR	7	4.5	0.7%	2.0	2.0	0	1	1	0
Trevor Jones	DT					13	2.0	0.3%	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	0
Brad Luvender	NT	6'3, 260	So.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7906
Parker Hanusa	DE	6'4, 240	RSFr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7726
Brady Wright	DE	6'3, 245	RSFr.	2 stars (5.2)	0.7683
Zach Abercrumbia	DT	6'2, 265	Fr.	3 stars (5.6)	0.8535
Carl Thompson	DT	6'3, 275	Fr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.8403
Blain Padgett	DE	6'5, 240	Fr.	2 stars (5.3)	0.8212

7. Starting from scratch on the pass rush

Nordstrom and Patt were one of the best mid-major pass-rush combinations in the country, Dylan Klare added five sacks from the tackle position, and while he missed half of 2014, Christian Covington still declared for the NFL Draft after dominating in 2013. Plus, linebacker James Radcliffe, perhaps Rice's best run defender (6.5 non-sack tackles for loss), graduated.

To say the least, that's a lot to lose, especially considering how important the line was for Rice's identity.

As with the receiving corps, there are some exciting new options, but they still have to prove themselves. Sophomore end Graysen Schantz and senior Grant Peterson combined for 26.5 tackles as backups, but 10 were behind the line, and they forced three fumbles. Tackles Trey Martin and Ross Winship saw playing time and made a few plays in Covington's absence, and 2013 starter Stuart Mouchantaf returns after missing 2014 with injury. Plus, three of the most highly touted incoming freshmen are linemen.

There are enough exciting underclassmen to assume good things in 2016, or maybe even the second half of 2015, but a slow start is a distinct possibility.

Linebackers

Name	Pos	Ht, Wt	2015 Year	Rivals	247 Comp.	GP	Tackles	% of Team	TFL	Sacks	Int	PBU	FF	FR
Alex Lyons	SLB	6'0, 225	Jr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.8100	13	57.5	8.8%	5.0	3.0	0	1	0	0
James Radcliffe	WLB					12	43.0	6.6%	6.5	0.0	1	2	0	0
Nick Elder	SLB	6'0, 225	Sr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7000	12	31.0	4.7%	0.0	0.0	0	1	0	0
Tabari McGaskey	WLB	6'0, 225	Jr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7600	13	20.0	3.1%	2.0	1.0	0	2	0	0
Emmanuel Ellerbee	LB	6'0, 225	So.	2 stars (5.3)	0.7694	13	9.0	1.4%	0.0	0.0	0	2	0	0
Nick Uretsky	WLB	6'0, 225	So.	2 stars (5.3)	0.7783	12	3.0	0.5%	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	0
Joe Ballard	LB	6'0, 215	So.	NR	NR	13	3.0	0.5%	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	0
DJ Green	LB	6'2, 235	So.	2 stars (5.4)	0.8460	13	3.0	0.5%	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	0

Secondary

Name	Pos	Ht, Wt	2015 Year	Rivals	247 Comp.	GP	Tackles	% of Team	TFL	Sacks	Int	PBU	FF	FR
Jaylon Finner	KAT					13	61.0	9.3%	0.5	0	0	5	2	0
Bryce Callahan	CB					13	41.5	6.3%	4	1	2	7	1	1
Gabe Baker	SS					12	40.5	6.2%	2	0	0	2	0	0
Julius White	FS					11	30.5	4.7%	5	0	0	7	0	0
Ryan Pollard	CB	5'8, 175	Sr.	2 stars (5.4)	NR	13	25.5	3.9%	1	0	2	8	0	0
Malcolm Hill	SS					13	22.5	3.4%	2	1	1	5	0	1
Cole Thomas	S	6'2, 200	So.	3 stars (5.5)	0.8241	13	16.5	2.5%	0	0	0	2	2	0
Destri White	KAT	6'0, 205	So.	2 stars (5.4)	0.8115	12	16.5	2.5%	0	0	0	0	0	0
J.T. Blasingame	CB	5'9, 175	Jr.	2 stars (5.3)	0.7100	9	13.0	2.0%	0	0	1	2	0	0
Garrett Fuhrman	FS	5'8, 190	Sr.	2 stars (5.2)	0.7400	12	9.5	1.4%	0	0	1	0	0	0
Zach Espinosa	S	6'2, 215	Sr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.7800	12	3.5	0.5%	0	0	0	0	0	0
V.J. Banks	CB	6'1, 185	So.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7726	10	3.0	0.5%	0	0	1	2	0	0
Adrian Jones	S					6	2.0	0.3%	0	0	0	0	0	0
Aston Walter	CB	5'8, 190	RSFr.	3 stars (5.5)	0.8360
J.T. Ibe	S	6'0, 195	RSFr.	2 stars (5.4)	0.7957
Christian Bertrand	S	6'0, 190	Fr.	2 stars (5.3)	0.7885

8. Really starting from scratch in the secondary

Operating from a Gary Patterson-style 4-2-5 defense and generating a hell of a pass rush without blitzing, Rice was able to use its safeties aggressively. Jaylon Finner, Gabe Baker, Julius White, and Malcolm Hill combined for 9.5 tackles for loss and 20 passes defensed, and cornerback Bryce Callahan pitched in with four and nine, respectively. They're all gone.

Corner Ryan Pollard does return, and three-star sophomore Cole Thomas hinted at play-making ability in a reserve role. (I'm using words like "hinted" and "potential" a lot, aren't I?) Destri White was a three-star 247 recruit, and redshirt freshmen Aston Walter and J.T. Ibe have mounds of athleticism.

But again, five of last year's top six are gone, and the new guys won't benefit from the same level of pass rush. And in the first five games of the season, Rice will have to face both Baylor's and Western Kentucky's offenses.

There aren't many good offenses in Conference USA, and after the midway point, Rice will find the level of competition much more to its liking. I do figure this will be a decent November defense, one that will have as much athleticism as any recent Rice D, but there will be growing pains. And Baylor and WKU might combine for 110 points.

Special Teams

Punter	Ht, Wt	2015 Year	Punts	Avg	TB	FC	I20	FC/I20 Ratio
James Farrimond	6'0, 220	Sr.	68	42.0	8	12	14	38.2%

Kicker	Ht, Wt	2015 Year	Kickoffs	Avg	TB	OOB	TB%
James Hairston			74	63.6	47	2	63.5%

Place-Kicker	Ht, Wt	2015 Year	PAT	FG (0-39)	Pct	FG (40+)	Pct
James Farrimond	6'0, 220	Sr.	25-25	7-7	100.0%	1-4	25.0%
James Hairston			22-23	5-6	83.3%	0-3	0.0%

Returner	Pos.	Ht, Wt	2015 Year	Returns	Avg.	TD
Brandon Hamilton	KR	5'11, 210	Jr.	16	22.8	0
Darik Dillard	KR	5'10, 205	Jr.	5	16.8	0
Bryce Callahan	PR			11	7.0	0
Mario Hull	PR			2	11.0	0

Category	Rk
Special Teams F/+	93
Field Goal Efficiency	102
Punt Return Efficiency	78
Kick Return Efficiency	67
Punt Efficiency	72
Kickoff Efficiency	76
Opponents' Field Goal Efficiency	49

9. Automatic inside 40

Rice wasn't great or terrible, but in James Farrimond, it does appear the Owls have a decent punter and a place-kicker who's automatic inside 40 yards. Farrimond was only 1-for-4 on longer kicks, but he didn't miss a shorter one. You can work with that.

And if Farrimond improves his punting numbers and anybody from a large crop of speedy freshmen or redshirt freshmen emerges as a return threat, Rice could see much more favorable field position.

2015 Schedule & Projection Factors

2015 Schedule
Date	Opponent	2014 F/+ Rk
5-Sep	Wagner	NR
12-Sep	at Texas	53
19-Sep	at North Texas	125
26-Sep	at Baylor	10
3-Oct	Western Kentucky	50
10-Oct	at Florida Atlantic	100
24-Oct	Army	121
31-Oct	Louisiana Tech	35
7-Nov	at UTEP	90
14-Nov	Southern Miss	110
21-Nov	at UTSA	109
28-Nov	Charlotte	NR

Five-Year F/+ Rk	-17.5% (95)
2- and 5-Year Recruiting Rk	92 / 83
2014 TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin*	8 / 8.7
2014 TO Luck/Game	-0.3
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.)	10 (6, 4)
2014 Second-order wins (difference)	7.9 (0.1)

10. Life as a proven entity

The mind pretty quickly adapts to a new reality. That can be good or bad. I'm thinking of Rice as a potential West favorite despite the fact that it is replacing two big-play receivers, three offensive line starters, four disruptive defensive linemen, and almost its entire secondary. But if a less-proven team like FAU or UTEP were to lose the same amount, we might be predicting a mini-collapse.

We're probably going to be right, though. There aren't enough offenses good enough to take total advantage of Rice's vulnerable defense, and some teams with potentially strong Os (FAU, Charlotte) have all sorts of defensive questions. Plus, while so much of the conference is looking to rebound from an awful offensive season or break in a new quarterback, Rice has Jackson and an experienced skill corps. Though he's only started for one season, Jackson is one of the conference's most proven entities, especially considering the amount he was asked to shoulder last year.

Louisiana Tech is probably the favorite in the West, but Rice gets probably its two toughest conference opponents at home (WKU, La. Tech), and if the Owls improve as they typically do, they could again cruise through November and hammer a fellow mid-major in Hawaii or Albuquerque. (Insert stock photo of David Bailiff grinning and wearing a lei here.)

Assuming success from Rice might still feel strange for anybody who paid attention to college football between about 1965 and 2005, but here we are.