/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/46237200/usa-today-8293312.0.jpg)
Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.
1. They improved
Over the previous nine years, Cincinnati's No. 47 F/+ ranking in 2014 was its third worst behind 2013 (64th) and 2010 (58th). That Tommy Tuberville has been in charge for two of those three seasons could be a sign of concern, if you're looking for one. The defense has yet to play at a top-50 level under Tuberville, and the running game, long a Tuberville staple, held the Bearcats back last year.
If you ignore context, you wonder about Cincinnati's trajectory moving forward. But you have to ignore a LOT of context, as few teams have been wrecked by injuries in the way Cincinnati was.
Ralph David Abernathy IV, a unique run-and-catch threat, played in two games and touched the ball four times. Hosey Williams, 2013's leading rusher, played in four games. Tion Green, an efficiency back in 2013, played in three. That's 1,488 yards of missing production. Oh, and Cincinnati started nine different offensive linemen.
On defense, the fact that the Bearcats improved at all (from 62nd in Def. S&P+ to 52nd) was impressive considering they had to replace every defensive tackle, lost likely starting cornerback Adrian Witty to injury, and got a combined four games out of what were supposed to be two contributing linebackers. UC was forced to become far more conservative than it wanted.
But after a slow start that featured blowout losses to Ohio State, Memphis, and Miami and a far-too-close win over Miami (Ohio), the Bearcats played like a legitimate top-25 team (we'll ignore the bowl loss to Virginia Tech, since it featured a walk-on quarterback because of injury) and finished 9-4. It was a second straight slow start for Cincy under Tuberville, but this one was far easier to understand.
Cincy enters 2015 with reason for severe optimism. Williams and Green join Mike Boone (who played quite well) in the backfield, and quarterback Gunner Kiel returns each of his top seven weapons from one of the nation's better passing attacks. Cincinnati must replace five offensive linemen (including an all-conference tackle) but returns four (including an all-conference tackle), and while the defensive front seven has some retooling, the secondary is in far healthier shape.
And after finishing 2014 strong, Tuberville inked what was deemed by the 247Sports Composite to be the best class in the AAC. Recruiting and last year's injuries have created what might be the strongest two-deep in the conference, and the schedule features visits from each of Cincy's primary division rivals (Temple and UCF).
If you're looking for reasons to set high expectations at Nippert Stadium, you've got them. Of course, good or bad, it's rarely a smart idea to set expectations for a Tuberville team. Regardless, the Bearcats should be fun as hell on offense, so even if they don't live up to the expectations I am setting for them (despite the fact that I know better), the entertainment factor should be high.
2014 Schedule & Results
Record: 9-4 | Adj. Record: 10-3 | Final F/+ Rk: 47 | |||||||
Date | Opponent | Opp. F/+ Rk | Score | W-L | Percentile Performance |
Adj. Scoring Margin |
Win Expectancy |
12-Sep | Toledo | 59 | 58-34 | W | 92% | 32.6 | 99% |
20-Sep | Miami (Ohio) | 103 | 31-24 | W | 59% | 5.1 | 86% |
27-Sep | at Ohio State | 1 | 28-50 | L | 64% | 8.2 | 24% |
4-Oct | Memphis | 41 | 14-41 | L | 24% | -16.6 | 1% |
11-Oct | at Miami | 31 | 34-55 | L | 7% | -34.4 | 0% |
18-Oct | at SMU | 127 | 41-3 | W | 83% | 22.5 | 100% |
24-Oct | South Florida | 123 | 34-17 | W | 85% | 24.2 | 100% |
31-Oct | at Tulane | 93 | 38-14 | W | 74% | 15.2 | 97% |
13-Nov | East Carolina | 61 | 54-46 | W | 73% | 14.4 | 66% |
22-Nov | at Connecticut | 119 | 41-0 | W | 96% | 42.3 | 100% |
29-Nov | at Temple | 67 | 14-6 | W | 86% | 25.0 | 96% |
6-Dec | Houston | 73 | 38-31 | W | 71% | 12.8 | 76% |
27-Dec | vs. Virginia Tech | 33 | 17-33 | L | 44% | -3.7 | 36% |
Category | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk |
S&P+ | 35.1 | 31 | 26.4 | 52 |
Points Per Game | 34.0 | 30 | 27.2 | 69 |
2. Two acts
After a brilliant performance against Toledo, Cincinnati hit a tailspin before rallying.
- Average Percentile Performance (first 5 games): 49% (record: 2-3)
- Average Percentile Performance (next 7 games): 81% (record: 7-0)
With the way Cincinnati running backs were exploding like Spinal Tap drummers*, it would be easy to pin a lot of the early troubles on the running game. After all, after rushing for 148 yards in the season opener against Toledo, UC averaged 83 rushing yards per game over the next four games.
But opponents were still struggling to get a grasp of Gunner Kiel and the passing game, and the offense was only so much of a problem. The biggest early issue for the Bearcats during their back-to-back-to-back blowout losses was the other side.
- Yards per play (first 5 games): Opponent 7.05, Cincinnati 6.20 (-0.85)
- Yards per play (next 7 games): Cincinnati 6.33, Opponent 5.23 (+1.10)
Mike Boone rushed 34 times for 325 yards against USF and Tulane in October, and UC found ways to stabilize the run. That allowed the Bearcats to improve offensively even as Kiel began to deal with injuries of his own.
But defensive improvement was the real story. After allowing at least a 151 passer rating in each of the first five games, even against Miami (Ohio), Cincy didn't allow anything higher than 137.4. And after allowing at least 5.9 yards per carry in three of the first five games, the Bearcats did so in just one of the final eight.
So what changed? The level of opponent, certainly. It's easy to look good when you're defending against SMU, USF, Tulane, UConn, and Temple. But Cincinnati's play took a clear step forward even when you adjust for opponent, and it's hard to figure out why. The personnel didn't change much, and while UC coaches began to use words like "simplify," that's what you always hear when a defense is struggling.
But SOMETHING changed, and the defense clicked.
Now, more change is afoot. Defensive co-coordinator Hank Hughes moved on to the same role at Nebraska, and Tuberville promoted Steve Clinkscale as the new co-coordinator with Robert Prunty. And while the secondary appears experienced, UC must replace four of its top six linemen and two fantastic linebackers (Jeff Luc and Nick Temple). If the Bearcats start slowly for the third straight season, defense will again most likely be the reason.
* I'm allowed to use the Spinal Tap drummer reference only once per annual preview series, and I've now played that card. Hold me to that.
Offense
FIVE FACTORS -- OFFENSE | ||||||
Raw Category | Rk | Opp. Adj. Category | Rk | |||
EXPLOSIVENESS | IsoPPP | 0.91 | 36 | IsoPPP+ | 130.0 | 15 |
EFFICIENCY | Succ. Rt. | 45.0% | 34 | Succ. Rt. + | 110.2 | 35 |
FIELD POSITION | Def. Avg. FP | 30.0 | 70 | Def. FP+ | 101.0 | 53 |
FINISHING DRIVES | Pts. Per Trip in 40 | 5.0 | 14 | Redzone S&P+ | 109.2 | 43 |
TURNOVERS | EXPECTED | 21.2 | ACTUAL | 22 | +0.8 |
Category | Yards/ Game Rk |
S&P+ Rk | Success Rt. Rk |
PPP+ Rk |
OVERALL | 29 | 20 | 25 | 15 |
RUSHING | 74 | 46 | 37 | 56 |
PASSING | 13 | 10 | 22 | 8 |
Standard Downs | 25 | 35 | 21 | |
Passing Downs | 12 | 15 | 9 |
Q1 Rk | 27 | 1st Down Rk | 19 |
Q2 Rk | 7 | 2nd Down Rk | 25 |
Q3 Rk | 47 | 3rd Down Rk | 19 |
Q4 Rk | 24 |
3. An excellent offense despite exploding backs
Even with a new running back seemingly every series, Cincinnati produced a top-50 running game, lacking in big plays to a degree but efficient enough to take heat off of the pass.
And despite all the shuffling, UC had just about every stat that you want to see when you're starting a young quarterback: the Bearcats were explosive on passing downs (what I tend to call the play-maker downs), they improved as a half unfolded, and they adapted when a particular tactic stopped working.
If Kiel gets hurt again, all bets are off. Seniors Jarred Evans and Michael Colosimo combined to complete seven of 18 passes last year, and the next best options are either a redshirt freshman (Hayden Moore) or a true freshman (Ross Trail). But that goes for most teams. If Kiel's healthy, this offense will be phenomenal.
Quarterback
Note: players in bold below are 2015 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.
Player | Ht, Wt | 2015 Year |
Rivals | 247 Comp. | Comp | Att | Yards | TD | INT | Comp Rate |
Sacks | Sack Rate | Yards/ Att. |
Gunner Kiel | 6'4, 208 | Jr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9869 | 233 | 390 | 3254 | 31 | 13 | 59.7% | 11 | 2.7% | 7.8 |
Munchie Legaux | 53 | 80 | 574 | 3 | 1 | 66.3% | 4 | 4.8% | 6.5 | ||||
Jarred Evans | 6'2, 190 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8298 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 40.0% | 2 | 28.6% | 0.4 |
Michael Colosimo | 6'2, 216 | Sr. | NR | NR | 5 | 13 | 78 | 1 | 0 | 38.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 6.0 |
Hayden Moore | 6'3, 193 | RSFr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8229 | |||||||||
Ross Trail | 6'3, 200 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8697 |
Running Back
Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2015 Year |
Rivals | 247 Comp. | Rushes | Yards | TD | Yards/ Carry |
Hlt Yds/ Opp. |
Opp. Rate |
Fumbles | Fum. Lost |
Rod Moore | RB | 143 | 618 | 5 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 35.7% | 1 | 1 | ||||
Mike Boone | RB | 5'10, 205 | So. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0.7893 | 101 | 650 | 9 | 6.4 | 6.7 | 40.6% | 1 | 1 |
Gunner Kiel | QB | 6'4, 208 | Jr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9869 | 52 | 251 | 1 | 4.8 | 4.3 | 44.2% | 7 | 3 |
Tion Green | RB | 6'0, 220 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8590 | 28 | 118 | 1 | 4.2 | 3.1 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 |
Hosey Williams | RB | 5'9, 199 | Sr. | 2 stars (5.2) | 0.8138 | 26 | 140 | 0 | 5.4 | 5.9 | 34.6% | 0 | 0 |
Jarred Evans | QB | 6'2, 190 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8298 | 20 | 117 | 1 | 5.9 | 2.5 | 60.0% | 1 | 0 |
Chad Banschbach | RB | 5'9, 185 | So. | NR | NR | 17 | 81 | 0 | 4.8 | 2.3 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 |
Munchie Legaux | QB | 16 | 79 | 1 | 4.9 | 1.7 | 68.8% | 0 | 0 | ||||
Bobby Brown | RB | 6'0, 200 | So. | NR | NR | 11 | 80 | 0 | 7.3 | 6.8 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 |
Shaq Washington | WR | 5'9, 174 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8609 | 8 | 23 | 0 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 |
Michael Colosimo | QB | 6'2, 216 | Sr. | NR | NR | 4 | 54 | 0 | 13.5 | 6.5 | 100.0% | 0 | 0 |
Joshuwa Holloman | RB | 5'11, 180 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8497 | ||||||||
Taylor Boose | RB | 6'0, 200 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8404 |
Receiving Corps
Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2015 Year |
Rivals | 247 Comp. | Targets | Catches | Yards | Catch Rate | Target Rate |
%SD | Yds/ Target |
NEY | Real Yds/ Target |
RYPR |
Shaq Washington | WR | 5'9, 174 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8609 | 99 | 66 | 761 | 66.7% | 20.9% | 62.6% | 7.7 | -31 | 7.6 | 119.3 |
Mekale McKay | WR | 6'6, 195 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8522 | 77 | 44 | 725 | 57.1% | 16.2% | 67.5% | 9.4 | 181 | 9.5 | 113.6 |
Max Morrison | WR | 6'1, 173 | Sr. | 2 stars (5.3) | NR | 64 | 45 | 458 | 70.3% | 13.5% | 59.4% | 7.2 | -77 | 7.2 | 71.8 |
Chris Moore | WR | 6'1, 190 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8441 | 59 | 30 | 673 | 50.8% | 12.4% | 59.3% | 11.4 | 292 | 11.4 | 105.5 |
Johnny Holton | WR | 6'3, 190 | Sr. | 2 stars (5.2) | 0.7000 | 50 | 29 | 431 | 58.0% | 10.5% | 56.0% | 8.6 | 73 | 8.6 | 67.5 |
Alex Chisum | WR | 6'3, 195 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8403 | 40 | 22 | 242 | 55.0% | 8.4% | 70.0% | 6.1 | -32 | 6.1 | 37.9 |
Nate Cole | WR | 6'1, 193 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8565 | 19 | 15 | 145 | 78.9% | 4.0% | 68.4% | 7.6 | -30 | 7.2 | 22.7 |
Rod Moore | RB | 19 | 9 | 137 | 47.4% | 4.0% | 42.1% | 7.2 | 21 | 7.1 | 21.5 | ||||
Casey Gladney | WR | 16 | 12 | 198 | 75.0% | 3.4% | 31.3% | 12.4 | 57 | 14.9 | 31.0 | ||||
Mike Boone | RB | 5'10, 205 | So. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0.7893 | 9 | 6 | 62 | 66.7% | 1.9% | 66.7% | 6.9 | -10 | 6.7 | 9.7 |
DJ Dowdy | TE | 6'4, 241 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8484 | 8 | 5 | 36 | 62.5% | 1.7% | 62.5% | 4.5 | -25 | 4.6 | 5.6 |
Hosey Williams | RB | 5'9, 199 | Sr. | 2 stars (5.2) | 0.8138 | 4 | 3 | 33 | 75.0% | 0.8% | 75.0% | 8.3 | -2 | 6.3 | 5.2 |
Tyler Cogswell | TE | 6'4, 248 | So. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8475 | ||||||||||
Tshumbi Johnson | WR | 5'11, 175 | So. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8522 | ||||||||||
Frank Labady | WR | 5'7, 170 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8299 | ||||||||||
Daniel Cobb | WR | 5'10, 170 | Fr. | 2 stars (5.3) | 0.8202 | ||||||||||
Kahlil Lewis | WR | 6'0, 180 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8529 | ||||||||||
Doug Bates | TE | 6'4, 230 | Fr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0.8267 |
4. Loaded
Your Cincy HQ
Your Cincy HQ
Now that the dust has settled, UC boasts three running backs who have posted an Opportunity Rate (percentage of carries gaining at least five yards) of 39 percent in one of the last two seasons -- Boone (41 percent) in 2014 and Williams (42 percent) and Green (39 percent) in 2013. And if these three either struggle, there could be interesting options like walk-on sophomore Bobby Brown (7.3 yards per carry in limited action) and mid-three-star freshmen Joshuwa Holloman and Taylor Boose.
Cincinnati has rushing options, and goodness knows there are receiving options. Shaq Washington is a steady possession man -- of the 75 FBS players targeted with at least 95 passes in 2014, Washington was one of only 25 with a catch rate of at least 67 percent. He and Max Morrison are the camp-out-in-a-hole-in-the-zone guys, and Mekale McKay, Chris Moore, and Johnny Holton (combined: 17.8 yards per catch) are the field stretchers.
UC is loaded with exciting senior receivers, and if defenses have to keep an eye on the run, Cincinnati is going to do some bad things.
Offensive Line
Category | Adj. Line Yds |
Std. Downs LY/carry |
Pass. Downs LY/carry |
Opp. Rate |
Power Success Rate |
Stuff Rate |
Adj. Sack Rate |
Std. Downs Sack Rt. |
Pass. Downs Sack Rt. |
Team | 110.2 | 3.07 | 3.12 | 40.3% | 69.0% | 14.8% | 145.9 | 3.2% | 5.3% |
Rank | 35 | 45 | 82 | 54 | 49 | 15 | 20 | 26 | 32 |
Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2015 Year |
Rivals | 247 Comp. | Career Starts | Honors/Notes |
Eric Lefeld | LT | 45 | 2014 1st All-AAC | ||||
Parker Ehinger | RT | 6'7, 315 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8042 | 38 | 2014 1st All-AAC |
Deyshawn Bond | C | 6'2, 298 | Jr. | 2 stars (5.3) | 0.8231 | 23 | |
Justin Murray | LT | 6'5, 295 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8331 | 12 | |
Tyreek Burwell | LG | 5 | |||||
Kevin Schloemer | RG | 5 | |||||
Ryan Leahy | LG | 6'6, 295 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8438 | 3 | |
Dominic Mainello | C | 3 | |||||
Cory Keebler | RT | 1 | |||||
Korey Cunningham | LT | 6'5, 254 | So. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0.8148 | 0 | |
Chad West | RT | 6'6, 292 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8073 | 0 | |
Ja'Merez Bowen | OL | 6'4, 270 | RSFr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8300 | ||
Luke Callahan | OL | 6'5, 278 | RSFr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8238 | ||
Ryan Stout | OL | 6'5, 265 | RSFr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0.8017 | ||
Delonte Murray | OL | 6'5, 311 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.7867 | ||
Idarius Ray | OL | 6'5, 305 | Jr. | 2 stars (5.2) | 0.7783 | ||
Evan Mallory | OL | 6'5, 302 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8463 | ||
Tyler McGarr | OL | 6'4, 275 | Fr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0.8054 |
5. No injuries, please
Offensive coordinator Eddie Gran, about whom I was a bit worried when he was first hired -- identity is an important thing, and his quotes reeked of "we're going to do everything!" -- proved his mettle, and with such depth at running back and receiver, he will have plenty of creative outlets.
But there is another area where injuries could wreck plans: offensive line.
Cincinnati finished with nine players having started at least one game, but five are now gone. All-conference tackle Parker Ehinger is back, as are two other established starters, but any injuries will likely lead to newcomers playing large roles. Maybe that will work -- Cincy boasts three three-star redshirt freshmen, two JUCO transfers, and two three-star true freshmen, and upside doesn't seem to be a problem -- but counting on freshman linemen to keep your offense moving is scary.
Defense
FIVE FACTORS -- DEFENSE | ||||||
Raw Category | Rk | Opp. Adj. Category | Rk | |||
EXPLOSIVENESS | IsoPPP | 0.81 | 37 | IsoPPP+ | 97.2 | 74 |
EFFICIENCY | Succ. Rt. | 43.6% | 89 | Succ. Rt. + | 91.4 | 103 |
FIELD POSITION | Off. Avg. FP | 28.6 | 101 | Off. FP+ | 98.0 | 88 |
FINISHING DRIVES | Pts. Per Trip in 40 | 4.0 | 29 | Redzone S&P+ | 100.4 | 62 |
TURNOVERS | EXPECTED | 23.8 | ACTUAL | 24.0 | +0.2 |
Category | Yards/ Game Rk |
S&P+ Rk | Success Rt. Rk |
PPP+ Rk |
OVERALL | 98 | 89 | 107 | 74 |
RUSHING | 87 | 92 | 102 | 84 |
PASSING | 100 | 87 | 99 | 71 |
Standard Downs | 75 | 98 | 56 | |
Passing Downs | 109 | 108 | 108 |
Q1 Rk | 96 | 1st Down Rk | 114 |
Q2 Rk | 64 | 2nd Down Rk | 74 |
Q3 Rk | 109 | 3rd Down Rk | 56 |
Q4 Rk | 84 |
6. Speeding up while tapping the brakes
It's hard to know what to make of a defense that was so bad in the first five games that its overall ratings were pretty terrible despite two months of quality play.
On paper, Cincinnati's defense was a bend-don't-break defense with a strong backbone -- tackles Brad Harrah, Camaron Beard, and Brandon Mitchell, middle linebacker Jeff Luc, safeties Zach Edwards and Andre Jones -- and not quite enough play-making ability on the edges. The Bearcats appeared to ease up and become more of a read-and-react machine over their long hot streak. It also made them really shaky on passing downs.
Defensive Line
Category | Adj. Line Yds |
Std. Downs LY/carry |
Pass. Downs LY/carry |
Opp. Rate |
Power Success Rate |
Stuff Rate |
Adj. Sack Rate |
Std. Downs Sack Rt. |
Pass. Downs Sack Rt. |
Team | 89.3 | 3.19 | 3.18 | 43.0% | 56.8% | 17.7% | 109.5 | 7.6% | 5.4% |
Rank | 107 | 101 | 51 | 110 | 12 | 91 | 42 | 11 | 102 |
Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2015 Year |
Rivals | 247 Comp. | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
Silverberry Mouhon | DE | 6'4, 252 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8026 | 13 | 33.0 | 4.3% | 5.0 | 4.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Terrell Hartsfield | DE | 13 | 30.0 | 3.9% | 12.0 | 9.0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Brad Harrah | DT | 13 | 24.0 | 3.1% | 6.0 | 3.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | ||||
Camaron Beard | DT | 13 | 22.5 | 2.9% | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Brandon Mitchell | DT | 6'2, 290 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8423 | 13 | 17.5 | 2.3% | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Jerrell Jordan | DE | 12 | 14.5 | 1.9% | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Alex Pace | DT | 6'2, 295 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8478 | 12 | 12.0 | 1.6% | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chris Burton | DT | 6'3, 272 | So. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8131 | 13 | 6.0 | 0.8% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mark Wilson | DE | 6'3, 225 | So. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0.7966 | 9 | 2.5 | 0.3% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hakeem Allonce | DT | 6'5, 290 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8454 | |||||||||
Landon Brazile | DE | 6'6, 230 | RSFr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8032 | |||||||||
Kimoni Fitz | DE | 6'4, 230 | RSFr. | 2 stars (5.2) | 0.8135 | |||||||||
Lyndon Johnson | DE | 6'6, 270 | Jr. | 2 stars (5.3) | 0.7694 | |||||||||
Bryan Wright | DE | 6'4, 235 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8228 | |||||||||
Marquise Copeland | DE | 6'3, 230 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8519 | |||||||||
Norman Oglesby | DT | 6'0, 265 | Fr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0.8220 | |||||||||
Caleb Ashworth | DE | 6'3, 235 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8066 |
Linebackers
Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2015 Year |
Rivals | 247 Comp. | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
Jeff Luc | MLB | 13 | 98.5 | 12.8% | 9.0 | 6.5 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | ||||
Nick Temple | WLB | 13 | 90.0 | 11.7% | 10.5 | 3.0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | ||||
Kevin Brown | SLB | 6'1, 206 | Sr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0.8292 | 13 | 21.5 | 2.8% | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Eric Wilson | WLB | 6'2, 225 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8438 | 13 | 20.5 | 2.7% | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Clemente Casseus | LB | 6'1, 227 | Sr. | NR | NR | 4 | 10.5 | 1.4% | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Kevin Hyland | MLB | 6'2, 230 | Sr. | NR | NR | 13 | 4.5 | 0.6% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Kevin Mouhon | LB | 6'2, 225 | RSFr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.8784 | |||||||||
Antonio Kinard | LB | 6'3, 220 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8364 | |||||||||
Jaylyin Minor | LB | 6'1, 240 | So. | 2 stars (5.3) | 0.7744 | |||||||||
Bryce Jenkinson | LB | 6'2, 220 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8361 | |||||||||
Matthew Draper | LB | 6'2, 214 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8488 |
7. Got a pass rush?
Defensively, we've changed a little bit of things that we do with our front. We've probably worked more on blitz this spring than we did last year, because we're going to be a pretty good man coverage team.
It was more or less a throwaway line within a short "How'd the spring go?" piece, but this quote was a nice reminder of how Tuberville adapts to his personnel.
The 60-year-old has been around -- he took his first defensive coordinator job at Miami 22 years ago, and this will be his 20th season as the head coach of a major-conference program. His defenses are strong as often as not, and while that has a lot to do with recruiting, it also has to do with adaptation.
Confident in their secondary, Tuberville and his co-coordinators will likely go further down the blitzing road, which could lead to more big plays for both the other offense and UC's defense. End Silverberry Mouton is a decent weapon, but unless a young end like Mark Wilson, Landon Brazile or Marquise Copeland surprises, Cincy will probably need blitzes.
There are plenty of athletic linebackers -- undersized senior Kevin Brown, Clemente Casseus, four-star redshirt freshman Kevin Mouhon, JUCO transfer Antonio Kinard -- but we'll see if it's effective. The secondary won't need a ton of help from the pass rush, but it will need a little.
Secondary
Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2015 Year |
Rivals | 247 Comp. | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
Zach Edwards | S | 5'11, 186 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8175 | 13 | 94.0 | 12.3% | 3.5 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
Leviticus Payne | CB | 5'10, 192 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8372 | 13 | 48.5 | 6.3% | 6.5 | 2.0 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 |
Grant Coleman | CB | 6'0, 176 | Jr. | NR | NR | 13 | 45.5 | 5.9% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Howard Wilder | CB | 13 | 39.5 | 5.1% | 2.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Andre Jones | S | 6'1, 197 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8369 | 13 | 36.5 | 4.8% | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Adrian Witty (2013) | CB | 5'10, 187 | Sr. | 2 stars (5.3) | 0.7778 | 13 | 36.5 | 5.4% | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Mike Tyson | S | 6'2, 200 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.7983 | 13 | 27.5 | 3.6% | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Linden Stephens | CB | 6'0, 185 | So. | 2 stars (5.2) | 0.8014 | 13 | 14.0 | 1.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Aaron Brown | CB | 5'11, 172 | So. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0.8000 | 12 | 9.0 | 1.2% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Carter Jacobs | S | 6'1, 193 | So. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.7806 | 13 | 7.5 | 1.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Chris Murphy | CB | 5'10, 180 | So. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8593 | |||||||||
JJ Pinckney | CB | 6'3, 185 | RSFr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8447 | |||||||||
Tyrell Gilbert | S | 6'1, 200 | RSFr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0.7893 | |||||||||
Malik Clements | S | 6'2, 185 | Fr. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0.8395 | |||||||||
Jhavonte Dean | CB | 6'1, 168 | Fr. | 2 stars (5.3) | 0.8184 |
8. If the front holds up, the back will hold up
Leviticus Payne played both linebacker and cornerback; he is a unique weapon and basically a perfect nickelback candidate. If Adrian Witty returns to form, he and Payne could give safeties Zach Edwards and Andre Jones some lovely security blankets on the edge. And if someone gets hurt, the second string will be made up of players with either experience, upside, or both. The ceiling's awfully high.
Special Teams
Punter | Ht, Wt | 2015 Year |
Punts | Avg | TB | FC | I20 | FC/I20 Ratio |
Sam Geraci | 6'4, 217 | So. | 51 | 39.4 | 5 | 13 | 15 | 54.9% |
John Lloyd | 11 | 36.3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 63.6% |
Kicker | Ht, Wt | 2015 Year |
Kickoffs | Avg | TB | OOB | TB% |
Tony Miliano | 83 | 62.6 | 34 | 1 | 41.0% |
Place-Kicker | Ht, Wt | 2015 Year |
PAT | FG (0-39) |
Pct | FG (40+) |
Pct |
Andrew Gantz | 5'9, 158 | So. | 52-54 | 11-12 | 91.7% | 5-8 | 62.5% |
Returner | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2015 Year |
Returns | Avg. | TD |
Johnny Holton | KR | 6'3, 190 | Sr. | 35 | 20.6 | 0 |
Casey Gladney | KR | 7 | 20.9 | 0 | ||
Shaq Washington | PR | 5'9, 174 | Sr. | 13 | 6.1 | 0 |
Category | Rk |
Special Teams F/+ | 30 |
Field Goal Efficiency | 20 |
Punt Return Efficiency | 11 |
Kick Return Efficiency | 120 |
Punt Efficiency | 51 |
Kickoff Efficiency | 60 |
Opponents' Field Goal Efficiency | 67 |
9. Young legs save the day
Special teams added a helping hand for the injured Bearcats. They improved from 123rd to 30th in Special Teams Efficiency, and with freshmen at kicker and punter, no less.
Andrew Gantz was solid inside of 40 yards and strong outside of it, and while Sam Geraci didn't have the longest punts, he had some of the highest. Kick returns were still a weakness, but Cincinnati ranked in the nation's top 60 in each special teams category.
There will be a new kickoffs guy in place, but Gantz and Geraci could be the anchors of a teams unit for the next three years. (Or not. Kickers are flaky.)
2015 Schedule & Projection Factors
2015 Schedule | ||
Date | Opponent | 2014 F/+ Rk |
5-Sep | Alabama A&M | NR |
12-Sep | Temple | 67 |
19-Sep | at Miami (Ohio) | 103 |
24-Sep | at Memphis | 41 |
1-Oct | Miami | 31 |
17-Oct | at BYU | 46 |
24-Oct | Connecticut | 119 |
31-Oct | Central Florida | 60 |
7-Nov | at Houston | 73 |
14-Nov | Tulsa | 117 |
20-Nov | at South Florida | 123 |
28-Nov | at East Carolina | 61 |
Five-Year F/+ Rk | 8.1% (47) |
2- and 5-Year Recruiting Rk | 68 / 57 |
2014 TO Margin / Adj. TO Margin* | 2 / 2.6 |
2014 TO Luck/Game | -0.2 |
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) | 12 (8, 4) |
2014 Second-order wins (difference) | 8.8 (0.2) |
10. If injury karma has been paid ...
... this will probably be the best team in the AAC. Cincy will be the safest bet, anyway. The Bearcats return almost every important piece of last year's massively improved offense and special teams units, plus a few more return from injury.
And if a new defense waits until October to find its footing again, it might not be as damaging. Cincinnati gets Temple and UCF at home, and when the Bearcats go to Memphis on September 24, they'll be taking on another team that is trying to find its defensive footing.
That Cincinnati improved and nearly won 10 games despite every reason not to was encouraging. The injury bug could bite just as hard, but if it doesn't, the Bearcats will have the best offense in the league and a defense that is in the more defense-friendly division. (Sorry, UConn. And USF. And UConn. And Temple.) If the right players are able to remain suited up, Cincinnati could do some awfully fun things.