/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/46276228/GettyImages-455338264.0.jpg)
At the end of each conference run-through (here's the whole AAC), I take a look at how I perceive the conference's balance of power heading into the season. This is in no way based on schedules, so they are not predictions. They're just how I would rank the teams after writing thousands of words about each of them.
In the last five years, the American/Big East has finished with at least a three-way tie at the top four times. It had a four-way tie in 2012.
Now, as it moves to the two-divisions-and-a-championship-game format, it will end up with just one champion ... but two opportunities to use tie-breakers.
There is serious logjam potential in both divisions; in the West, Memphis should regress just enough to open the door for Navy or a dark horse like Houston or Tulane. In the East, Cincinnati and UCF will start the year feeling like favorites, with Temple and ECU not far behind.
This might not be a power conference, but if you like down-to-the-wire finishes, this could again be the conference for you.
Tier 1
1. Cincinnati
2. Navy
3. UCF
4. Memphis
5. Temple
As I put it in Cincinnati's preview, I think the Bearcats are the AAC's safest bet. They absorbed countless injuries last year and played like a top-25 team for most of the last two months. Of course, injuries could strike again, and I know damn well the dangers of putting any expectations whatsoever, good or bad, on a Tommy Tuberville team. But I said "safest bet," not "slam-dunk lock."
If any of these five teams wins the conference, it won't be much of a surprise. Navy returns quite a bit (including a star quarterback) from its best team in five years, one that would have had the second-best F/+ rating in the conference last year. UCF is still crazy-athletic, if inexperienced in key areas. Memphis, last year's best team, could bring enough back on offense to offset defensive loss, and Temple was basically a more extreme Memphis (worse offense, better defense) that returns all 11 defensive starters.
After Cincinnati, I have moved these four teams around countless times since starting this post. They are almost interchangeable.
Tier 2
6. East Carolina
7. Houston
These two have the most party-wrecking capability, but I think they have one or two more flaws than the Tier 1ers.
ECU has to replace its best quarterback, running back, wide receiver, and defensive lineman, and while there is a wealth of candidates, they're dealing with potential more than production. If there's a team I'm being unfair to, it's probably the Pirates, who ranked almost even with UCF in F/+ (and on the field, for that matter) and return more starters. My gut could be wrong.
Though Houston returns an excellent backfield -- one new head coach Tom Herman will know how to utilize -- the Cougars are starting over in the receiving corps and the defensive front seven. Still, they're only a couple of steps behind.
Tier 3
8. Tulane
I have no idea what to do with Tulane. I expect the Green Wave to go bowling, and I expect them to be quite a bit better than the four teams below, but it feels like they're behind the rest of the pack.
Tier 4
9. Tulsa
10. SMU
11. South Florida
12. UConn
These four graded out dramatically lower than everybody else in the AAC, and while at least a couple could improve by quite a bit, the teams above them should, too. Three have made exciting coaching hires within the last 16 months, but the rebuilds are going to take a little while.
Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.
AAC East
Team | 2014 Record (Conf.) | 2014 F/+ Rk | 5-Yr F/+ Rk | 2-Yr Rec. Rk | 5-Yr Rec. Rk | 2014 TO Luck/Gm | Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) |
2014 2nd-order wins |
Cincinnati | 9-4 (7-1) | 47 | 90 | 90 | 77 | -0.2 | 12 (8, 4) | 8.8 (+0.2) |
UCF | 9-4 (7-1) | 60 | 38 | 52 | 59 | -1.2 | 9 (5, 4) | 8.4 (+0.6) |
Temple | 6-6 (4-4) | 67 | 77 | 71 | 79 | +0.8 | 19 (8, 11) | 6.6 (-0.6) |
ECU | 8-5 (5-3) | 61 | 71 | 76 | 75 | +1.1 | 11 (6, 5) | 9.4 (-1.4) |
USF | 4-8 (3-5) | 123 | 78 | 50 | 52 | +1.9 | 12 (4, 8) | 3.8 (+0.2) |
UConn | 2-10 (1-7) | 119 | 90 | 90 | 77 | -5.2 | 14 (6, 8) | 2.2 (-0.2) |
AAC West
Team | 2014 Record (Conf.) | 2014 F/+ Rk | 5-Yr F/+ Rk | 2-Yr Rec. Rk | 5-Yr Rec. Rk | 2014 TO Luck/Gm | Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) |
2014 2nd-order wins |
Navy | 8-5 (N/A) | 44 | 55 | 78 | 97 | -1.0 | 11 (5, 6) | 7.4 (+0.6) |
Memphis | 10-3 (7-1) | 41 | 104 | 85 | 89 | +1.0 | 11 (8, 3) | 10.1 (-0.1) |
Houston | 8-5 (5-3) | 73 | 53 | 79 | 71 | +0.8 | 10 (5, 5) | 7.6 (+0.4) |
Tulane | 3-9 (2-6) | 93 | 115 | 81 | 78 | +1.3 | 15 (8, 7) | 3.5 (-0.5) |
Tulsa | 2-10 (2-6) | 117 | 63 | 83 | 76 | -1.1 | 17 (10, 7) | 1.9 (+0.1) |
SMU | 1-11 (1-7) | 127 | 82 | 86 | 73 | -1.4 | 15 (8, 7) | 1.2 (-0.2) |