clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Vanderbilt fans, just tell yourselves this: Stanford stunk in Jim Harbaugh's first season

New, comments

The good part about being as bad as you possibly can? It's pretty easy to get better!

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.

1. Change takes a lot

We lean on history in college football. Most teams play in the same stadiums they were in decades ago, with the same fight song and same school colors. Frats and sororities pomp for Homecoming. Old coaches and players stand bronzed outside of stadiums. Et cetera.

Case in point: Vanderbilt. They're toast. It's over. They're Vandy again. Hope they had fun.

The Commodores went 18-8 in 2012-13 and finished ranked in the AP poll in both years. James Franklin came to Nashville for three seasons and built a sturdy, smart squad. The Commodores were good in defense and special teams, leaned on timely big plays on offense, and put themselves in position to capitalize on mistakes. They went 24-15, and while there were perhaps lucky wins, that doesn't explain why they were successful; they were just 7-7 in one-possession games over those three years (1-5 the first year, 6-2 the next two).

Franklin signed recruiting classes that far exceeded expectations, and they're still matriculating. But when Franklin left for Penn State, his replacement didn't get off on the right foot. An absurdly young roster was mediocre on defense and nightmarish on offense, and the Commodores went 3-9, losing a few competitive games, getting blown out a few times, and barely beating the two worst teams on the schedule. They were awful, 115th in the F/+ rankings.

If this were a different school, we might talk ourselves into a Year 0 situation. Some of the most renowned coaches in college football have labored through awful debut seasons before; there are the obvious examples (Lou Holtz and George O'Leary going winless in their respective first seasons at South Carolina and UCF), but there's also another relevant one: Jim Harbaugh's first Stanford team went just 4-7 in his debut.

Second-year head coach Derek Mason spent four years at Stanford under Harbaugh and David Shaw, rising to defensive coordinator in 2012. That's the perfect preparation for taking over a program at a smart-kid school. And if Vandy had been successful for more than just a small handful of years in the last half-century, we wouldn't be writing him and his 'Dores off just yet.

But oh man, are we writing them off.

2. Stanford was still better than this

Everything I just said is true, and Mason's tenure in Nashville is far from hopeless. But that took some spin, didn't it?

Vandy was so very, very awful. How bad is 115th in F/+? Here are the 10 teams that ranked ahead of the SEC's Commodores:

105. Akron (5-7)
106. Ohio (6-6)
107. Kent State (2-9)
108. Old Dominion (6-6)
109. UTSA (4-8)
110. Southern Miss (3-9)
111. Hawaii (4-9)
112. Idaho (1-10)
113. Wyoming (4-8)
114. Buffalo (5-6)

All 10 are mid-majors, and they averaged four wins. This is 14 spots worse than Wake Forest and 16 worse than Kansas. Vanderbilt was far worse than everybody else in the power-conference orbit.

It's really hard to come back from 115th no matter how young you are.

Between youth and the "it almost literally can't get worse" factor, expect improvement. The defense has promise, and the run game might be semi-efficient. But it's hard to give too much refutation to those writing the Commodores off. It's going to take a lot to come back.

2014 Schedule & Results

Record: 3-9 | Adj. Record: 3-9 | Final F/+ Rk: 115
Date Opponent Opp. F/+ Rk Score W-L Percentile
Performance
Adj. Scoring
Margin
Win
Expectancy
28-Aug Temple 67 7-37 L 13% -26.9 0%
6-Sep Ole Miss 5 3-41 L 12% -27.0 0%
13-Sep Massachusetts 120 34-31 W 57% 4.3 66%
20-Sep South Carolina 38 34-48 L 26% -15.2 4%
27-Sep at Kentucky 68 7-17 L 6% -35.6 0%
4-Oct at Georgia 4 17-44 L 31% -11.5 0%
11-Oct Charleston Southern N/A 21-20 W 46% -2.5 89%
25-Oct at Missouri 20 14-24 L 41% -5.5 11%
1-Nov Old Dominion 108 42-28 W 73% 14.2 84%
8-Nov Florida 32 10-34 L 16% -23.0 0%
22-Nov at Mississippi State 13 0-51 L 3% -45.0 0%
29-Nov Tennessee 24 17-24 L 52% 1.0 25%

Category Offense Rk Defense Rk
S&P+ 19.0 118 29.9 76
Points Per Game 17.2 119 33.3 106

3. Bad at home, awful on the road

If you're scrounging for hopeful results, there are a few to lean on.

Granted, the three F/+ top-15 teams on the schedule beat Vandy by an average of 45-7, but the Commodores shut down Tennessee's offense in the season finale, limiting the Vols to 4 yards per play and averaging 4.1 themselves. Plus, they stayed within 10 points of eventual East champion Missouri on the road and didn't let Kentucky or South Carolina pull away to any major degree.

Missouri game aside, though, Vandy fit the role of "bad young team." The Commodores were occasionally salty at home and mostly abysmal on the road.

They say defense travels. When the road team has the ball is when the crowd is going to make noise. But while the defense remained about the same for VU in and out of Nashville, it's safe to say the offense didn't travel.

  • Average Percentile Performance (home): 37% (~top 80 | avg. score: Opp 33, VU 21)
  • Average Percentile Performance (road): 20% (~top 105 | avg. score: Opp 34, VU 10)

In four road games, VU once gained more than 240 yards and never scored more than 17 points. The 'Dores weren't exactly unstoppable at home, but they at least had moments: 34 points and 6.9 yards per play against South Carolina, 42 and 6.2 against ODU.

Of course, the offense might have stood more of a chance if VU had been able to put the same quarterback on the field from week to week. Instead, the Commodores cycled through virtually every QB on the roster.

Offense

FIVE FACTORS -- OFFENSE
Raw Category Rk Opp. Adj. Category Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS IsoPPP 0.69 126 IsoPPP+ 82.9 109
EFFICIENCY Succ. Rt. 37.6% 108 Succ. Rt. + 89.4 113
FIELD POSITION Def. Avg. FP 30.6 82 Def. FP+ 99.0 77
FINISHING DRIVES Pts. Per Trip in 40 3.4 117 Redzone S&P+ 81.6 119
TURNOVERS EXPECTED 22.5 ACTUAL 29 +6.5
Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 125 106 113 109
RUSHING 116 111 99 120
PASSING 107 94 113 83
Standard Downs 90 88 89
Passing Downs 127 127 126
Q1 Rk 114 1st Down Rk 90
Q2 Rk 67 2nd Down Rk 101
Q3 Rk 123 3rd Down Rk 114
Q4 Rk 78

4. Second chance, first impression

Karl Dorrell is by all accounts a good guy, and at 51 years old, he's got plenty of coaching ahead of him. But the former UCLA coach was an interesting choice as Mason's first coordinator.

He hadn't coached in the college ranks since he left UCLA in 2007, and his last couple of Bruin offenses were lacking, to say the least: 55th in Off. S&P+ in 2006, then 83rd in 2007. His old-school, pro-style approach has had its moments -- he was Rick Neuheisel's coordinator when Colorado was putting up huge numbers in 1995, and his 2005 UCLA offense did rank fifth in Off. S&P+.

But the college game has evolved since the last time Dorrell was in charge of a good O. He was going through a learning process just as his players were, and the combination was ... not fruitful.

Under Dorrell, VU averaged 4.7 yards per play, topping the national average of 5.8 per play just twice and falling below 4 per play three times. Vandy scored 10 points in its first two games, and in the quarters most heavily focused on the game plan (Q1 and Q3), VU was horrific: 114th in Q1 S&P+, 123rd in Q3. It was ugly.

Mason saw the writing on the wall. He dumped Dorrell and brought in former Wisconsin coordinator Andy Ludwig. Ludwig's Wisconsin offense was run-heavy and slow-paced, and that probably means another heavy load for running back Ralph Webb, who averaged nearly 18 carries per game as a redshirt freshman and 24 carries for 113 yards in Vandy's three wins. He also averaged 16 carries for just 62 yards in SEC competition, but he was efficient for a freshman and could develop into a nice five-yards-per-carry back who keeps VU out of second-and-long.

Quarterback

Note: players in bold below are 2015 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.

Player Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. Comp Att Yards TD INT Comp
Rate
Sacks Sack Rate Yards/
Att.
Johnny McCrary 6'4, 220 So. 4 stars (5.8) 0.8839 78 152 985 9 8 51.3% 4 2.6% 6.1
Patton Robinette
43 67 454 3 3 64.2% 6 8.2% 5.6
Wade Freebeck 6'5, 226 So. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8324 34 72 376 1 5 47.2% 7 8.9% 4.2
Stephen Rivers
25 65 334 0 3 38.5% 2 3.0% 4.6
Shawn Stankavage 6'2, 195 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8406








Kyle Shurmur 6'4, 226 Fr. 4 stars (5.8) 0.8974








Running Back

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. Rushes Yards TD Yards/
Carry
Hlt Yds/
Opp.
Opp.
Rate
Fumbles Fum.
Lost
Ralph Webb RB 5'10, 202 So. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8256 212 907 4 4.3 3.2 39.6% 3 2
Dallas Rivers RB/FB 6'1, 224 So. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8672 61 218 2 3.6 1.8 34.4% 0 0
Jerron Seymour RB
25 123 0 4.9 3.6 40.0% 0 0
Patton Robinette QB
23 107 1 4.7 6.1 30.4% 1 0
Johnny McCrary QB 6'4, 220 So. 4 stars (5.8) 0.8839 18 67 0 3.7 3.1 33.3% 1 1
Wade Freebeck QB 6'5, 226 So. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8324 5 8 0 1.6 N/A 0.0% 0 0
Kellen Williams FB
Darrius Sims RB 5'9, 188 Jr. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8609
Josh Crawford RB 5'10, 200 Fr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8407







Receiving Corps

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. Targets Catches Yards Catch Rate Target
Rate
%SD Yds/
Target
NEY Real Yds/
Target
RYPR
Latevius Rayford WR 6'1, 198 Jr. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8418 61 36 350 59.0% 18.3% 52.5% 5.7 -93 5.8 42.8
Steven Scheu TE 6'5, 245 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8156 60 39 525 65.0% 18.0% 63.3% 8.8 55 8.9 64.2
C.J. Duncan (injury) WR 5'11, 200 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8300 55 28 441 50.9% 16.5% 58.2% 8.0 86 8.0 54.0
Davis Dudchock TE
25 17 261 68.0% 7.5% 68.0% 10.4 58 9.5 31.9
Chandler Dorrell WR 5'11, 185 So. NR NR 25 10 118 40.0% 7.5% 36.0% 4.7 -17 4.3 14.4
Caleb Scott WR 6'2, 195 So. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8422 21 6 78 28.6% 6.3% 42.9% 3.7 -12 4.1 9.5
Ralph Webb RB 5'10, 202 So. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8256 18 10 30 55.6% 5.4% 38.9% 1.7 -94 2.0 3.7
Trey Wilkins WR
16 7 66 43.8% 4.8% 37.5% 4.1 -26 2.8 8.1
Kris Kentera WR 6'4, 218 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7593 15 7 113 46.7% 4.5% 40.0% 7.5 22 8.3 13.8
Nathan Marcus TE 6'5, 240 So. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8464 12 6 56 50.0% 3.6% 66.7% 4.7 -20 5.2 6.9
Jordan Cunningham WR
7 4 27 57.1% 2.1% 42.9% 3.9 -22 4.0 3.3
Kellen Williams FB
6 3 29 50.0% 1.8% 83.3% 4.8 -9 3.3 3.5
Trent Sherfield WR 6'0, 200 So. 4 stars (5.8) 0.8649 3 1 9 33.3% 0.9% 66.7% 3.0 -5 2.6 1.1
Darrius Sims RB 5'9, 188 Jr. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8609 2 2 14 100.0% 0.6% 50.0% 7.0 -9 8.1 1.7
Curtis Graves WR 6'2, 198 Jr. NR NR
DeAndre Woods WR 6'3, 235 So. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8786
Sean Dowling TE 6'5, 270 So. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8625
Ronald Monroe WR 6'3, 200 RSFr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8569
Rashad Canty WR 6'3, 205 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8174
Sam Dobbs TE 6'4, 220 Fr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8538
Jared Pinkney WR 6'4, 240 Fr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8287

5. So many sophomores

Dorrell's VU offense had a Stanford twinge to it: lots of rushing and plenty of passes to the tight end. Senior Steven Scheu should continue to be a nice weapon; he led VU with 525 receiving yards and did quite a bit of damage against SEC East foes. Against South Carolina, Georgia, Missouri, Florida, and Tennessee, he caught 22 passes for 374 yards. That means he caught 17 passes for 151 yards in the other seven games, but an up-and-down season is better than a down one.

Scheu is a unique weapon. He's also just about the only senior who will touch the ball. The starting quarterback will likely be either sophomore Wade Freebeck or Johnny McCrary. Sophomore Dallas Rivers will carry the ball when sophomore Webb isn't. Sophomore C.J. Duncan enters as the most dangerous returning wideout [Update: Duncan will likely miss 2015 due to a leg injury], and sophomores Chandler Dorrell and Caleb Scott might start. And sophomore Sean Dowling is at tight end after spending some time at tackle.

Vandy's 2017 seniors are going to play the largest role in determining Vandy's 2015 success. That will mean plenty of development time for the future, but it doesn't say good things about the present, especially since almost nobody put up semi-encouraging stats last year.

McCrary's first three games at QB were encouraging. He completed 62 percent of his passes at 13.7 yards per completion, with eight touchdowns to two interceptions, against Charleston Southern, Missouri, and Old Dominion. But he was horrific in the next three: 42 percent completion rate, 10.9 yards per completion, one touchdown, four picks.

Freebeck wasn't any better sans a decent performance against South Carolina. But he seemed to take to Ludwig's offense better than McCrary this spring and seems to have the edge heading into fall camp.

Offensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs

LY/carry
Pass.
Downs

LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs

Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs

Sack Rt.
Team 96.6 2.89 3.36 37.5% 60.0% 20.5% 81.2 3.5% 11.6%
Rank 89 76 59 82 110 81 97 33 118
Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. Career Starts Honors/Notes
Joe Townsend C 34
Jake Bernstein RG 6'4, 310 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8364 32
Spencer Pulley C 6'4, 300 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8400 29
Andrew Jelks (injury) LT 6'6, 307 Jr. 4 stars (5.8) 0.8849 21
Andrew Bridges RT
18
Will Holden RT 6'7, 312 Jr. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8465 11
Barrett Gouger LG 6'4, 308 Jr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8586 0
Kevin McCoy RG 6'5, 305 Jr. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8456 0
Blake Fromang RT 6'7, 305 Jr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8360 0
Delando Crooks LG 6'5, 315 So. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8661 0
Cole Hardin C 6'4, 300 RSFr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8585
Bailey Granier LT 6'6, 315 RSFr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8445
Bruno Reagan OL 6'3, 315 RSFr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8275
Egidio DellaRipa RT 6'4, 300 So. 3 stars (5.5) 0.7900
Justin Skule OL 6'7, 305 Fr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8457
Jared Southers OL 6'4, 315 Fr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8290

6. Experience up front

Timing might not be Vandy's friend. While the quarterback and quite a few skill position guys might peak in 2017, the line could be young then. It's loaded with juniors and seniors this year.

[Update: Starting left tackle Andrew Jelks will miss the season due to a knee injury.]

But that's a concern for later. In 2015, the VU line has far more experience than the rest of the Vandy offense. If there's actual skill here to go with the 93 career starts, the line could be alright.

"Could" is the operative word. It's hard to succeed when you're blocking for freshmen, but in the more line-reliant stats, Vandy was awful: 110th in power success rate, 81st in stuff rate. The Commodores have experience and the requisite size (the 14 players listed above average 6'5, 308), but that's not the entire battle.

SIGN UP FOR OUR COLLEGE FOOTBALL NEWSLETTER

Get all kinds of college football stories, rumors, game coverage, and Jim Harbaugh oddity in your inbox every day.

Defense

FIVE FACTORS -- DEFENSE
Raw Category Rk Opp. Adj. Category Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS IsoPPP 0.86 75 IsoPPP+ 100.4 65
EFFICIENCY Succ. Rt. 43.2% 86 Succ. Rt. + 95.0 89
FIELD POSITION Off. Avg. FP 28.4 105 Off. FP+ 98.0 88
FINISHING DRIVES Pts. Per Trip in 40 4.7 95 Redzone S&P+ 95.6 82
TURNOVERS EXPECTED 18.3 ACTUAL 13.0 -5.3
Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 70 72 91 65
RUSHING 88 75 93 60
PASSING 50 81 72 95
Standard Downs 68 79 63
Passing Downs 82 101 81
Q1 Rk 101 1st Down Rk 78
Q2 Rk 72 2nd Down Rk 38
Q3 Rk 61 3rd Down Rk 79
Q4 Rk 72

Defensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs

LY/carry
Pass.
Downs

LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs

Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs

Sack Rt.
Team 95.3 2.87 3.56 42.5% 68.5% 17.8% 92.1 4.4% 7.0%
Rank 86 59 86 106 74 89 81 71 72
Name Pos Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Vince Taylor NT
12 31.5 4.6% 3.0 1.5 0 1 0 1
Caleb Azubike DE 6'4, 260 Sr. 4 stars (5.8) 0.8663 11 28.5 4.1% 6.0 4.0 0 0 0 0
Adam Butler DE 6'5, 300 Jr. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8685 12 25.5 3.7% 7.5 2.5 0 3 0 0
Barron Dixon DE
10 23.0 3.3% 1.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Jay Woods DE 6'3, 280 So. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8996 12 21.5 3.1% 1.5 0.0 0 0 0 0
Jonathan Wynn DE 6'4, 250 So. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8609 11 9.0 1.3% 1.5 1.0 0 0 0 0
Nifae Lealao NT 6'5, 315 So. 4 stars (5.9) 0.9501 9 4.5 0.7% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Torey Agee DE 6'4, 282 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8339 4 2.0 0.3% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Sekou Clark DE 6'3, 264 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8186
Riley Tindol DE 6'5, 262 RSFr. 2 stars (5.3) 0.7844








7. A little bit of potential up front

With Vanderbilt's defensive success under Franklin and coordinator Bob Shoop, and with Mason's success as Stanford's coordinator, it made sense to assume the VU defense might have decent upside. Technically, there was more to like on this side of the ball, but the Commodores weren't effective.

Part of that could be youth, but I still expected more. So did Mason, evidently. He fired coordinator David Kotulski and replaced him with ... himself.

Two of Vandy's most high-profile signees are on the defensive line. Caleb Azubike has shown random glimpses of four-star pass-rushing potential, and blue-chipper Nifae Lealao saw rotation time as a true freshman.

Vandy ranked 75th in Rushing S&P+, 85th in Adj. Line Yards, and 81st in Adj. Sack Rate, and a lack of experience was less of a legitimate excuse here.

Well, it wasn't an excuse for the line, The top three linebackers were two freshmen and a sophomore, and while they made a few plays (Stephen Weatherly was an alluring playmaker), they made mistakes as well.

Regardless of where most of the blame should lie, there are pieces with potential. Adam Butler proved versatile for a 300-pounder, recording 7.5 tackles for loss and batting down three passes. And younger players like Lealao, Jay Woods, and Jonathan Wynn could realize more upside. And the ceiling's pretty high for a linebacking corps that returns Weatherly and both sophomore inside linebackers. As with so many other pieces of this team, the front seven should be better in 2016 than it will be in 2015.

Linebackers

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Nigel Bowden ILB 6'1, 240 So. 4 stars (5.8) 0.8755 11 57.5 8.3% 2.0 1.0 0 1 1 0
Zach Cunningham ILB 6'4, 230 So. 4 stars (5.8) 0.9015 11 52.0 7.5% 6.5 1.5 0 2 1 0
Stephen Weatherly OLB 6'5, 250 Jr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8507 12 42.5 6.2% 12.5 4.5 0 1 1 0
Darreon Herring ILB 6'2, 230 Sr. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8581 12 34.0 4.9% 3.5 0.5 0 0 0 0
Kyle Woestmann OLB
11 23.5 3.4% 5.5 1.0 0 2 1 0
Ja'karri Thomas ILB 6'1, 230 Jr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8302 11 14.0 2.0% 0.5 0.0 0 1 0 0
Jake Sealand ILB
7 8.0 1.2% 0.5 0.0 0 0 0 0
Hawkins Mann ILB
2 4.5 0.7% 0.5 0.0 0 0 0 0
Casey Hughes ILB
9 3.5 0.5% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Landon Stokes OLB 6'4, 240 So. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8524 10 3.0 0.4% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Jimmy Stewart OLB
11 2.0 0.3% 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Harding Harper ILB 6'2, 240 Jr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8303
Charles Wright OLB 6'3, 236 RSFr. 2 stars (5.3) 0.7819
Nehemiah Mitchell OLB 6'4, 260 Jr. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8565
Josh Smith LB 6'3, 236 Fr. 4 stars (5.9) 0.9343
Caleb Peart LB 6'1, 230 Fr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8625
Dare Odeyingbo LB 6'2, 252 Fr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8544
Jordan Griffin LB 6'0, 215 Fr. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8538

Secondary

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Torren McGaster CB 6'0, 200 Jr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8463 12 56.0 8.1% 3.5 0 2 5 1 0
Andrew Williamson SS 6'1, 212 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7826 12 43.0 6.2% 4 0 0 3 0 0
Jahmel McIntosh FS 6'1, 202 Sr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8252 12 32.0 4.6% 1.5 0 1 2 0 0
Taurean Ferguson CB 5'9, 185 So. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8497 11 27.5 4.0% 1.5 0 2 4 0 0
Oren Burks FS 6'3, 215 So. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8600 8 26.5 3.8% 0 0 0 7 0 0
Ryan White SS 5'9, 190 So. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8918 9 26.5 3.8% 3.5 0.5 0 2 1 0
Tre Bell CB 6'0, 178 So. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8662 9 17.0 2.5% 0 0 0 2 0 0
Tre Tarpley SS 6'0, 202 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8306 11 16.0 2.3% 2 0 0 0 2 0
Paris Head CB
4 9.0 1.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tre Herndon CB 6'1, 185 So. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8386 12 8.0 1.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Darrius Sims NB 5'9, 188 Jr. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8609 12 3.5 0.5% 0 0 1 1 0 0
Emmanuel Smith FS 6'2, 218 So. 4 stars (5.8) 0.8922 9 2.0 0.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jalen Banks SS 5'11, 195 So. 3 stars (5.7) 0.8625 11 2.0 0.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
LaDarius Wiley CB 6'1, 205 So. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8320
Bryce Lewis DB 6'0, 180 RSFr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8535
Donovan Sheffield CB 5'11, 182 Fr. 4 stars (5.8) 0.8982








8. A lot of potential in the back

Vandy's pass defense was basically as good as its pass rush. If the Commodores were getting any pressure, the secondary was typically able to hold up. They allowed more big pass plays than you'd like; despite a slow tempo and the fact that they were behind frequently (and opponents were therefore leaning on the run), Vandy still allowed 108 passes of 10-plus yards (61st in the country) and 39 of 20-plus (58th). Not awful, but not good either.

The front seven should improve, and while the secondary will be led by two senior safeties and junior corner Torren McGaster, there's plenty of youth. Six freshman defensive backs made at least 8 tackles last year, and freshmen become sophomores. Toss in four-star sophomore Emmanuel Smith (who barely played) and incoming four-star cornerback Donovan Sheffield, and in theory there's a high ceiling ...

... in 2017. I'm a broken record, but 2015 will be about growth, not fully realized potential.

Special Teams

Punter Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Punts Avg TB FC I20 FC/I20
Ratio
Colby Cooke 6'3, 215 Jr. 66 42.4 7 11 19 45.5%
Taylor Hudson 3 32.7 2 0 0 0.0%
Kicker Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Kickoffs Avg TB OOB TB%
Tommy Openshaw 6'2, 185 So. 26 58.3 8 2 30.8%
Hayden Lekacz 6'0, 195 So. 18 58.6 5 0 27.8%
Place-Kicker Ht, Wt 2015
Year
PAT FG
(0-39)
Pct FG
(40+)
Pct
Tommy Openshaw 6'2, 185 So. 21-21 6-6 100.0% 2-5 40.0%
Hayden Lekacz 6'0, 195 So. 1-1 0-0 N/A 0-1 0.0%
Returner Pos. Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Returns Avg. TD
Darrius Sims KR 5'9, 188 Jr. 31 24.5 2
Dallas Rivers KR 6'1, 224 So. 10 15.1 0
Trey Ellis PR 5'10, 168 So. 9 5.4 0
Darrius Sims PR 5'9, 188 Jr. 6 5.5 0
Category Rk
Special Teams F/+ 71
Field Goal Efficiency 80
Punt Return Efficiency 20
Kick Return Efficiency 81
Punt Efficiency 22
Kickoff Efficiency 120
Opponents' Field Goal Efficiency 87

9. Turning special teams over to the youngsters, too

Even special teams was dominated by freshmen and sophomores. Colby Cooke was one of the nation's better punters, Tommy Openshaw made all of his kicks that were under 40 yards, and Darrius Sims and Trey Ellis proved dangerous in the return game.

Sims scored twice on returns but got stopped for tiny gains a lot, and the combination of Openshaw's and Hayden Lekacz's kickoffs and shoddy coverage gave Vandy one of the nation's worst kickoff units. (Then again, the Commodores weren't kicking off very much, so the damage was limited.)

But everybody's back. Aside from sample size issues, there's little reason to think Vandy won't improve from 71st in special teams efficiency to at least the 50s or 60s.

2015 Schedule & Projection Factors

2015 Schedule
Date Opponent Proj. S&P+ Rk
3-Sep Western Kentucky 61
12-Sep Georgia 3
19-Sep Austin Peay NR
26-Sep at Ole Miss 6
3-Oct at Middle Tennessee 87
17-Oct at South Carolina 31
24-Oct Missouri 23
31-Oct at Houston 85
7-Nov at Florida 29
14-Nov Kentucky 52
21-Nov Texas A&M 22
28-Nov at Tennessee 20
Five-Year F/+ Rk -7.6% (75)
2- and 5-Year Recruiting Rk 48 / 40
2014 TO Margin / Adj. TO Margin* -16 / -4.2
2014 TO Luck/Game -4.9
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) 18 (9, 9)
2014 Second-order wins (difference) 2.8 (0.2)

10. This is not the schedule for a rebound

Vanderbilt was a house stripped to its foundation. The Commodores were destined to be bad, and they were young enough that they should expect to improve.

It's not too late for Mason, but it would have been hard to start worse. It began with a blowout loss to Temple and finished with an 0-8 SEC campaign, and only a few youngsters hinted at upside.

Plus, some of Mason's decisions were questionable. His hire of Dorrell was a bit of a red flag, and the fact that he had to fire both coordinators after a single season (and that he trusted only himself to lead the defense) raises major questions about his ability to work with assistants. And some of his 2015 Media Days quotes came across as somewhere between odd and naive. (For one: "I assumed just because we were in the SEC we’d play like an SEC team. We didn’t.")

So yeah, Mason's Commodores have a long road, and while Year 0 situations happen and coaches make mistakes early in their first head coaching tenures, there's quite a bit for Mason to make up for.

This time, his schedule is tougher, as well. Vandy will take on a team that ranked higher last year in 11 of 12 games, and two of the worse teams (MTSU, Houston) play host.

Mason still has time, and his roster is still all sorts of hopeful, but his odds aren't great.