/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/50013335/usa-today-8941180.0.jpg)
Check out the advanced-stats glossary here. Below, a unique review of last year's team, a unit-by-unit breakdown of this year's roster, the full 2016 schedule with win projections for each game, and more.
1. Prolonging the magic
I've been spending a good portion of this offseason diving into college football's strange history. I'm done with about three-quarters of the chapters for my second book (The 50 Best* College Football Teams of All-Time), and to accompany that, I've crept back to the early-1970s in what is basically a year-to-year Study Hall almanac of sorts.
My Study Hall posts have centered around an estimated version of my S&P+ ratings, which gives teams an annual percentile grade, like standardized tests. In the history of college football, only eight programs have hit the 99th percentile in at least seven seasons. Nobody else has done it more than four times.
- 14: Alabama
- 11: Notre Dame
- 8: Michigan, Oklahoma, USC
- 7: Florida State, Miami, Nebraska
Of these eight programs, two have done all of their damage within the last 40 years (FSU, Miami), two in the last 60 (Nebraska, Oklahoma), and two haven't had a 99th-percentile team for at least 25 years (Michigan, Notre Dame).
That leaves just two programs who achieved blue-blood status nearly 100 years ago and have recently put together a run of dominant form: Alabama and USC. They play each other on the opening Saturday of the 2016 season.
Both programs have achieved all their dominance within the tenures of only four coaches. And for the most part, these successful coaches had almost no school ties before they were hired.
For Bama, Wallace Wade (99th-percentile teams: 1925, 1930) was a Brown graduate and a Vanderbilt assistant. Frank Thomas (1934, 1945) was a Notre Dame grad and former Georgia assistant and Chattanooga head coach. Bear Bryant (1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978) was a Thomas protege and Bama grad, but had 13 years of head coaching experience elsewhere. Nick Saban (2009, 2011, 2012, 2014, 2015) is a Kent State grad and was a nomad.
It's the same story for USC. Howard Jones (1931, 1932) graduated from Yale and spent eight years at Iowa (and one at Duke). John McKay (1972) was an Oregon grad and had spent nine years as an Oregon assistant and just one as a USC assistant. John Robinson (1978) was also an Oregon grad and former Oregon assistant; he spent three years as McKay's offensive coordinator, then took over in 1976. Pete Carroll (2002, 2004, 2005, 2008) was another nomad and about the seventh choice for the job in late 2000.
After Bryant's retirement, Alabama tried to keep the Bear magic alive. Among the Crimson Tide's post-Bryant hires were former Bryant receiver Ray Perkins, former Bryant assistant Gene Stallings, former Bryant defensive lineman Mike DuBose and former Perkins quarterback Mike Shula. Stallings had 11 years of head coaching experience in both college and the NFL, and he was the only one to briefly succeed at an elite level. It wasn't until they brought in Saban, an outsider, that they maintained eliteness.
USC is in the middle of a similar stage. When Carroll left for the NFL, Garrett brought back former offensive coordinator Lane Kiffin. When Kiffin didn't work, new athletic director Pat Haden replaced him with Carroll's other former offensive coordinator, Steve Sarkisian. When Sarkisian was dismissed last season, Haden replaced him with Kiffin's quarterbacks coach and Sarkisian's offensive coordinator, Clay Helton.
The thinking is easy to understand: You can't do this job unless you understand it, and you can't understand it unless you've been here for a while. (At USC, that has extended to the athletic director's office -- the last three ADs have also been former USC stars: Garrett, Haden, and now Lynn Swann.)
Recent evidence doesn't support this, however.
On the bright side, this is a small sample size. Maybe Helton is the guy to break this string. He has a unique set of ties beyond Southern California. He went to school at Auburn and Houston. His pre-USC stops were in Duke, Houston, and Memphis. His dad was Howard Schnellenberger's first offensive coordinator at Miami and Houston's head coach for much of the 1990s. His experience is not Sarkisian's or Kiffin's or DuBose's or Shula's or anyone else's.
Maybe Helton will thrive. He's got talent. But it's pretty easy to feel like Haden made a lazy hire.
This is Bill C's daily preview series, working its way through every 2016 team. Catch up on the Pac-12 so far!
2015 Schedule & Results
Record: 8-6 | Adj. Record: 12-2 | Final F/+ Rk: 17 | Final S&P+ Rk: 17 | ||||||||
Date | Opponent | Opp. F/+ Rk | Score | W-L | Percentile Performance |
Win Expectancy |
vs. S&P+ | Performance vs. Vegas |
5-Sep | Arkansas State | 71 | 55-6 | W | 100% | 100% | +31.9 | +22.0 |
12-Sep | Idaho | 114 | 59-9 | W | 99% | 100% | +11.2 | +7.0 |
19-Sep | Stanford | 6 | 31-41 | L | 78% | 47% | -17.2 | -20.0 |
26-Sep | at Arizona State | 50 | 42-14 | W | 97% | 100% | +24.6 | +22.5 |
8-Oct | Washington | 13 | 12-17 | L | 61% | 24% | -24.9 | -22.0 |
17-Oct | at Notre Dame | 7 | 31-41 | L | 67% | 32% | -8.1 | -3.0 |
24-Oct | Utah | 22 | 42-24 | W | 80% | 69% | +12.2 | +14.5 |
31-Oct | at California | 29 | 27-21 | W | 74% | 55% | +0.5 | 0.0 |
7-Nov | Arizona | 77 | 38-30 | W | 82% | 83% | -15.3 | -10.0 |
13-Nov | at Colorado | 94 | 27-24 | W | 68% | 65% | -17.1 | -13.5 |
21-Nov | at Oregon | 23 | 28-48 | L | 15% | 0% | -24.7 | -16.0 |
28-Nov | UCLA | 28 | 40-21 | W | 73% | 45% | +16.4 | +16.0 |
5-Dec | vs. Stanford | 6 | 22-41 | L | 45% | 4% | -18.3 | -14.5 |
30-Dec | vs. Wisconsin | 32 | 21-23 | L | 71% | 37% | -5.1 | -5.0 |
Category | Offense | Rk | Defense | Rk |
S&P+ | 39.6 | 15 | 24.7 | 43 |
Points Per Game | 33.9 | 37 | 25.7 | 50 |
Part of Haden's rationale for promoting Helton from interim head coach to full-timer is that he steered the USC ship pretty well following Sarkisian's awkward dismissal. Under strange circumstances, avoiding collapse is an accomplishment.
That said, the on-field quality regressed significantly after Sarkisian's departure.
- First 5 games:
Record: 3-2 | Average percentile performance: 87% (~top 15) | Yards per play: USC 7.5, Opp 5.0 (+2.5) - Next 5 games:
Record: 4-1 | Average percentile performance: 74% (~top 35) | Yards per play: USC 6.0, Opp 5.8 (+0.2) - Last 4 games:
Record: 1-3 | Average percentile performance: 51% (~top 65) | Yards per play: Opp 6.6, USC 5.0 (-1.6)
Maybe there were morale reasons. But even accounting for the fact that the schedule was pretty brutal -- three S&P+ top-15 opponents in the first six games, six more opponents ranked 32nd or better thereafter -- USC was a shadow of itself late in the season. The Trojans rallied to thump UCLA and secure the Pac-12 South, but after winning four games in a row in October and November, USC faded.
Maybe it would have happened no matter who was in charge. Helton now gets to prove himself with a full year's template.
Offense
FIVE FACTORS -- OFFENSE | ||||||
Raw Category | Rk | Opp. Adj. Category | Rk | |||
EXPLOSIVENESS | IsoPPP | 1.27 | 62 | IsoPPP+ | 112.3 | 35 |
EFFICIENCY | Succ. Rt. | 44.7% | 30 | Succ. Rt. + | 112.2 | 23 |
FIELD POSITION | Def. Avg. FP | 29.5 | 59 | Def. FP+ | 26.4 | 10 |
FINISHING DRIVES | Pts. Per Scoring Opportunity | 4.9 | 28 | Redzone S&P+ | 111.0 | 33 |
TURNOVERS | EXPECTED | 15.6 | ACTUAL | 12 | -3.6 |
Category | Yards/ Game Rk |
S&P+ Rk | Success Rt. Rk |
PPP+ Rk |
OVERALL | 38 | 29 | 23 | 35 |
RUSHING | 70 | 33 | 31 | 42 |
PASSING | 31 | 31 | 24 | 33 |
Standard Downs | 27 | 18 | 35 | |
Passing Downs | 42 | 49 | 39 |
Q1 Rk | 37 | 1st Down Rk | 26 |
Q2 Rk | 16 | 2nd Down Rk | 31 |
Q3 Rk | 35 | 3rd Down Rk | 44 |
Q4 Rk | 43 |
Quarterback
Note: players in bold below are 2016 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.
Player | Ht, Wt | 2016 Year |
Rivals | 247 Comp. | Comp | Att | Yards | TD | INT | Comp Rate |
Sacks | Sack Rate | Yards/ Att. |
Cody Kessler | 298 | 446 | 3536 | 29 | 7 | 66.8% | 38 | 7.9% | 6.8 | ||||
Max Browne | 6'5, 220 | Jr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9939 | 8 | 12 | 113 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 9.4 |
Jalen Greene | 6'1, 200 | So. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8700 | |||||||||
Sam Darnold | 6'4, 225 | RSFr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.9319 | |||||||||
Matt Fink | 6'3, 195 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8724 |
3. Max Browne and blue-chip potential
When you're merely good at USC, you don't garner the respect you should. Cody Kessler was efficient and accurate; he took too many sacks and didn't have the strongest arm, but he was reliably got the ball to his playmakers.
With Kessler, USC's offense was perfectly decent last year, even though it faded with each progressing month. He set the bar in a relatively strange place: high enough that his successor might not clear it and low enough that a QB living up to a blue-chip recruiting rating could clear it by a long shot.
Max Browne was Kessler's backup for the last two years, which is to say that he wasn't as good as Kessler. But as a big-armed junior, he still seems to have plenty of raw tools.
If Browne is able to take advantage of another potentially amazing receiving corps, the Trojans could make enough big plays to live up to assumed upside. But we know almost nothing about his decision-making ability.
Running Back
Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2016 Year |
Rivals | 247 Comp. | Rushes | Yards | TD | Yards/ Carry |
Hlt Yds/ Opp. |
Opp. Rate |
Fumbles | Fum. Lost |
Justin Davis | TB | 6'1, 200 | Sr. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9525 | 169 | 902 | 7 | 5.3 | 4.8 | 42.6% | 1 | 0 |
Ronald Jones II | TB | 6'1, 195 | So. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9821 | 153 | 987 | 8 | 6.5 | 7.1 | 41.8% | 1 | 0 |
Tre Madden | TB | 85 | 452 | 5 | 5.3 | 5.0 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | ||||
Cody Kessler | QB | 23 | 99 | 4 | 4.3 | 5.8 | 30.4% | 4 | 4 | ||||
Dominic Davis | TB | 5'10, 180 | So. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.8868 | 14 | 69 | 0 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 |
Aca'Cedric Ware | TB | 6'0, 195 | So. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.8711 | 12 | 36 | 1 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 |
Adoree' Jackson | WR/CB | 5'11, 185 | Jr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9959 | 7 | 36 | 0 | 5.1 | 10.6 | 28.6% | 1 | 0 |
James Toland IV | TB | 5'11, 195 | Jr. | NR | NR | ||||||||
Vavae Malapeai | TB | 6'0, 190 | Fr. | 4 stars (5.9) | 0.9147 |
Receiving Corps
Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2016 Year |
Rivals | 247 Comp. | Targets | Catches | Yards | Catch Rate | Target Rate |
Yds/ Target |
%SD | Success Rate |
IsoPPP |
JuJu Smith-Schuster | WR | 6'2, 220 | Jr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9901 | 135 | 89 | 1454 | 65.9% | 30.8% | 10.8 | 60.7% | 54.8% | 1.80 |
Steven Mitchell Jr. | WR | 5'10, 190 | Jr. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9698 | 55 | 37 | 335 | 67.3% | 12.5% | 6.1 | 65.5% | 47.3% | 1.14 |
Darreus Rogers | WR | 6'1, 215 | Sr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.9503 | 44 | 28 | 289 | 63.6% | 10.0% | 6.6 | 54.5% | 43.2% | 1.41 |
Adoree' Jackson | WR/CB | 5'11, 185 | Jr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9959 | 28 | 27 | 414 | 96.4% | 6.4% | 14.8 | 71.4% | 53.6% | 2.70 |
Justin Davis | TB | 6'1, 200 | Sr. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9525 | 23 | 18 | 189 | 78.3% | 5.2% | 8.2 | 52.2% | 47.8% | 1.52 |
Tyler Petite | TE | 6'5, 235 | So. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.9141 | 23 | 15 | 145 | 65.2% | 5.2% | 6.3 | 65.2% | 39.1% | 1.50 |
De'Quan Hampton | WR | 6'4, 225 | Sr. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9044 | 22 | 15 | 165 | 68.2% | 5.0% | 7.5 | 59.1% | 59.1% | 1.18 |
Tre Madden | TB | 21 | 17 | 133 | 81.0% | 4.8% | 6.3 | 47.6% | 47.6% | 1.20 | ||||
Jalen Greene | QB/WR | 6'1, 200 | So. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8700 | 18 | 10 | 104 | 55.6% | 4.1% | 5.8 | 61.1% | 55.6% | 0.91 |
Taylor McNamara | TE | 6'5, 245 | Sr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.9069 | 13 | 12 | 83 | 92.3% | 3.0% | 6.4 | 69.2% | 76.9% | 0.74 |
Deontay Burnett | WR | 6'0, 170 | So. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8584 | 11 | 10 | 161 | 90.9% | 2.5% | 14.6 | 54.5% | 81.8% | 1.47 |
Isaac Whitney | WR | 6'3, 220 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8733 | 11 | 8 | 112 | 72.7% | 2.5% | 10.2 | 54.5% | 54.5% | 1.84 |
Jahleel Pinner | FB | 10 | 5 | 22 | 50.0% | 2.3% | 2.2 | 70.0% | 40.0% | 0.49 | ||||
Ronald Jones II | TB | 6'1, 195 | So. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9821 | 9 | 7 | 39 | 77.8% | 2.1% | 4.3 | 66.7% | 44.4% | 0.83 |
Dominic Davis | TB | 5'10, 180 | So. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.8868 | 8 | 7 | 102 | 87.5% | 1.8% | 12.8 | 62.5% | 62.5% | 1.91 |
Ajene Harris | WR | 5'11, 190 | So. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.7941 | |||||||||
Jack Jones | WR/CB | 5'11, 170 | Fr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9853 | |||||||||
Tyler Vaughns | WR | 6'2, 180 | Fr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9800 | |||||||||
Michael Pittman Jr. | WR | 6'4, 210 | Fr. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9645 | |||||||||
Josh Imatorbhebhe | WR | 6'2, 210 | Fr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.9294 | |||||||||
Trevon Sidney | WR | 5'11, 170 | Fr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.9336 | |||||||||
Cary Angeline | TE | 6'6, 230 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.9023 | |||||||||
Velus Jones Jr. | WR | 6'0, 185 | Fr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.8727 |
4. Seductive skill guys
If Browne is a Tee Martin, USC's offense will be just fine. Martin, USC's offensive coordinator, succeeded Peyton Manning at Tennessee in 1998, and while his natural gifts didn't match Manning's, he did a lovely job of distributing the ball and keeping things moving forward. It didn't hurt that he had an incredible selection of skill guys: receiver Peerless Price (61 catches, 920 yards); running backs Travis Henry, Travis Stephens, and Jamal Lewis (combined: 1,944 rushing yards); etc.
Browne might not have a line as effective as Tennessee's that year, but he has the athletes.
Ronald Jones II was reasonably efficient and all sorts of explosive while rushing for 987 yards as a freshman last year. He and veteran Justin Davis could make for a wonderful duo.
The receiving corps features one of the nation's best: junior JuJu Smith-Schuster, who combined high-level efficiency (55 percent success rate) with explosiveness (16.3 yards per catch) and one hell of a stiff arm.
Smith-Schuster probably didn't get as much help as he should have from his supporting cast -- the No. 2 and 3 targets (Steven Mitchell Jr. and Darreus Rogers) averaged just 6.3 yards per target -- but there are more options this year. Helton's first signing class featured six high-upside freshman targets, including five-stars Jack Jones and Tyler Vaughns. Jones appears to be an Adoree' Jackson clone (Jackson splits time at receiver and cornerback), and with this many high-ceiling guys, the odds are good that Smith-Schuster will see more support this year.
And if he does, then ... yikes. Browne will only have to be decent for the offense to end up back in the Off. S&P+ top 15.
Offensive Line
Category | Adj. Line Yds |
Std. Downs LY/carry |
Pass. Downs LY/carry |
Opp. Rate |
Power Success Rate |
Stuff Rate |
Adj. Sack Rate |
Std. Downs Sack Rt. |
Pass. Downs Sack Rt. |
Team | 103.2 | 3.00 | 3.44 | 41.1% | 68.8% | 19.4% | 84.0 | 4.0% | 11.9% |
Rank | 55 | 47 | 45 | 35 | 44 | 68 | 89 | 44 | 122 |
Player | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2016 Year |
Rivals | 247 Comp. | 2015 Starts | Career Starts | Honors/Notes |
Zach Banner | RT | 6'9, 360 | Sr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9683 | 14 | 27 | 2015 2nd All-Pac-12 |
Max Tuerk | C | 5 | 38 | |||||
Chad Wheeler | LT | 6'6, 310 | Sr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8257 | 13 | 35 | |
Toa Lobendahn | C | 6'3, 295 | Jr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.9383 | 7 | 20 | |
Viane Talamaivao | RG | 6'2, 315 | Jr. | 4 stars (5.9) | 0.9608 | 8 | 19 | |
Damien Mama | LG | 6'4, 325 | Jr. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9808 | 13 | 17 | |
Khaliel Rodgers | C | 6'3, 315 | Jr. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9373 | 6 | 9 | |
Chris Brown | LG | 6'5, 300 | So. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.9079 | 2 | 2 | |
Nico Falah | C | 6'4, 280 | Jr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.9130 | 1 | 1 | |
Chuma Edoga | RT | 6'4, 290 | So. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9877 | 1 | 1 | |
Jordan Simmons | RG | 6'4, 325 | Sr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9654 | 0 | 0 | |
Clayton Johnston | RT | 6'6, 285 | So. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.8913 | 0 | 0 | |
Jordan Austin | OT | 6'5, 300 | So. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8400 | 0 | 0 | |
Roy Hemsley | LT | 6'5, 310 | RSFr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.8872 | |||
Cole Smith | C | 6'4, 280 | RSFr. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8640 | |||
Nathan Smith | OT | 6'6, 275 | Fr. | 4 stars (5.9) | 0.8998 | |||
E.J. Price | OT | 6'6, 325 | Fr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.9560 | |||
Frank Martin II | OT | 6'5, 310 | Fr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.9152 |
5. Whole vs. sum of parts
Of course, you still need an offensive line. While USC's line was blocking for a freshman running back (part of the time, anyway) and protecting a QB who had the tendency to hold onto the ball too long, USC's line stats were still quite a bit worse than its overall offensive stats. That tends to suggest you have a problem up front.
This makes sense. USC dealt with instability and injury on the line last year, starting 10 guys at least once and seven guys at least five times. And seven of the 10 one-time starters were either freshmen or sophomores.
With all-conference tackle Zach Banner returning, the line does have one star. And if it can mostly stick with whatever the projected starting five ends up becoming, that should help significantly. But we'll see how much of these line problems was due to inexperience and how much was due to lack of pure quality.
Defense
FIVE FACTORS -- DEFENSE | ||||||
Raw Category | Rk | Opp. Adj. Category | Rk | |||
EXPLOSIVENESS | IsoPPP | 1.27 | 73 | IsoPPP+ | 106.8 | 42 |
EFFICIENCY | Succ. Rt. | 42.6% | 77 | Succ. Rt. + | 114.8 | 21 |
FIELD POSITION | Off. Avg. FP | 28.0 | 108 | Off. FP+ | 31.1 | 40 |
FINISHING DRIVES | Pts. Per Scoring Opportunity | 4.3 | 55 | Redzone S&P+ | 105.8 | 42 |
TURNOVERS | EXPECTED | 18.0 | ACTUAL | 23.0 | +5.0 |
Category | Yards/ Game Rk |
S&P+ Rk | Success Rt. Rk |
PPP+ Rk |
OVERALL | 65 | 35 | 21 | 42 |
RUSHING | 41 | 30 | 11 | 38 |
PASSING | 94 | 47 | 37 | 54 |
Standard Downs | 33 | 14 | 48 | |
Passing Downs | 40 | 39 | 33 |
Q1 Rk | 71 | 1st Down Rk | 27 |
Q2 Rk | 27 | 2nd Down Rk | 59 |
Q3 Rk | 18 | 3rd Down Rk | 41 |
Q4 Rk | 29 |
6. Welcome back, Clancy
Cal's average Def. S&P+ ranking in its five years before hiring Clancy Pendergast: 48.8.
In the three years since he left: 102.
That makes what he did at Cal pretty impressive. His three Golden Bears defenses ranked 21st, 26th, and 48th.
In his lone year as Lane Kiffin's DC at USC in 2013, his Trojan D ranked eighth. It hadn't been better than 29th in the four previous years and hasn't been better than 35th since.
Pendergast gets results and seems to get them rather quickly. So what can he do in his second USC debut?
Defensive Line
Category | Adj. Line Yds |
Std. Downs LY/carry |
Pass. Downs LY/carry |
Opp. Rate |
Power Success Rate |
Stuff Rate |
Adj. Sack Rate |
Std. Downs Sack Rt. |
Pass. Downs Sack Rt. |
Team | 107.7 | 2.96 | 3.16 | 36.7% | 58.1% | 17.6% | 130.1 | 6.5% | 9.2% |
Rank | 40 | 81 | 59 | 48 | 25 | 96 | 23 | 22 | 30 |
Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2016 Year |
Rivals | 247 Comp. | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
Delvon Simmons | DT | 14 | 44.5 | 5.5% | 10.5 | 4.0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | ||||
Greg Townsend Jr. | DE | 14 | 32.0 | 3.9% | 7.0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Antwaun Woods | DT | 14 | 28.5 | 3.5% | 7.0 | 3.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Stevie Tu'ikolovatu (Utah) |
DT | 6'1, 320 | Sr. | NR | NR | 13 | 21.5 | 3.3% | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Scott Felix | RUSH | 14 | 21.5 | 2.6% | 5.5 | 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||||
Porter Gustin | RUSH | 6'5, 260 | So. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9811 | 14 | 19.5 | 2.4% | 6.5 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Claude Pelon | DE | 10 | 19.0 | 2.3% | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||||
Noah Jefferson | NT | 6'6, 315 | So. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9026 | 14 | 17.5 | 2.1% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rasheem Green | DT | 6'5, 280 | So. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9893 | 14 | 12.5 | 1.5% | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Kenny Bigelow Jr. | DT | 6'3, 295 | Jr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9949 | 13 | 8.5 | 1.0% | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Jabari Ruffin | RUSH | 6'3, 245 | Sr. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9719 | 14 | 7.0 | 0.9% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Don Hill | DE | 6'2, 240 | So. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8626 | 5 | 5.0 | 0.6% | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Malik Dorton | DT | 6'2, 280 | So. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8769 | |||||||||
Jacob Daniel | NT | 6'4, 310 | So. | 4 stars (5.9) | 0.9646 | |||||||||
Christian Rector | DT | 6'5, 275 | RSFr. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8753 | |||||||||
Josh Fatu | DT | 6'3, 290 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.6) | 0.8278 | |||||||||
Oluwole Betiku Jr. | RUSH | 6'3, 250 | Fr. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9875 | |||||||||
Connor Murphy | DE | 6'7, 255 | Fr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.9063 |
Linebackers
Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2016 Year |
Rivals | 247 Comp. | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
Su'a Cravens | OLB | 14 | 66.0 | 8.1% | 15.0 | 5.5 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | ||||
Cameron Smith | MLB | 6'2, 245 | So. | 4 stars (5.9) | 0.9189 | 10 | 63.0 | 7.7% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Anthony Sarao | WLB | 14 | 45.5 | 5.6% | 5.0 | 3.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Olajuwon Tucker | MLB | 6'3, 230 | Jr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.8871 | 8 | 32.0 | 3.9% | 3.5 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Lamar Dawson | LB | 8 | 23.0 | 2.8% | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | ||||
Uchenna Nwosu | OLB | 6'3, 235 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.5) | 0.8306 | 14 | 22.5 | 2.8% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Osa Masina | OLB | 6'4, 230 | So. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9845 | 12 | 21.0 | 2.6% | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Michael Hutchings | MLB | 6'1, 215 | Sr. | 4 stars (5.9) | 0.9496 | 12 | 9.0 | 1.1% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quinton Powell | WLB | 6'2, 200 | Sr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.9259 | 13 | 9.0 | 1.1% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Reuben Peters | MLB | 6'0, 225 | So. | 2 stars (5.4) | 0.8111 | 6 | 3.5 | 0.4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
John Houston Jr. | WLB | 6'3, 220 | RSFr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9759 |
7. If this defense underachieves...
...it will be because of the front seven. Pendergast's lone USC defense was fine against the run and spectacular against the pass, and considering turnover, we might see something similar this year.
There are plenty of former star recruits in the mix, but USC has to replace five of last year's top six tacklers on the line and three of five at linebacker. Granted, plenty of linebackers saw the field last year because of injury, but the Trojans must still replace their best run-defending LB in Su'a Cravens.
The USC line had just begun to overcome the depth issues associated with NCAA sanctions; now it has to start over. Goodness knows there's talent -- former blue-chipper Porter Gustin looks like a lab-created rush end. Utah graduate transfer Stevie Tu'ikolovatu proves a boost of experience, as well.
Still, this line didn't provide as much disruption as recruiting rankings would suggest last year, and now most of the first and second string have been lopped off.
Here's where new leadership could provide a boost. Helton didn't stop at bringing in a new defensive coordinator; he rebooted the rest of the defensive staff as well. Former assistant strength coach Kenechi Udeze is the new defensive line coach, Johnny Nansen has moved from running backs coach to linebackers, and secondary coach Ronnie Bradford was brought in from Louisiana Tech. Change doesn't mean improvement, but when it's accompanied by change on the two-deep, it might not be the worst thing in the world.
Secondary
Name | Pos | Ht, Wt | 2016 Year |
Rivals | 247 Comp. | GP | Tackles | % of Team | TFL | Sacks | Int | PBU | FF | FR |
Chris Hawkins | FS | 5'11, 185 | Jr. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9740 | 14 | 55.0 | 6.8% | 1.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Iman Marshall | CB | 6'1, 200 | So. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9985 | 14 | 53.0 | 6.5% | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Adoree' Jackson | CB/WR | 5'11, 185 | Jr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9959 | 14 | 29.0 | 3.6% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
John Plattenburg | SS | 5'11, 180 | Jr. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.8819 | 13 | 28.5 | 3.5% | 3.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Marvell Tell III | SS | 6'3, 190 | So. | 4 stars (5.9) | 0.9709 | 10 | 27.5 | 3.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Kevon Seymour | CB | 11 | 21.0 | 2.6% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Jonathan Lockett | CB | 5'11, 180 | Jr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.9231 | 12 | 17.5 | 2.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Leon McQuay III | FS | 6'1, 195 | Sr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9842 | 9 | 14.0 | 1.7% | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
Matt Lopes | S | 5'11, 195 | Jr. | NR | NR | 9 | 11.0 | 1.4% | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Isaiah Langley | CB | 6'0, 170 | So. | 4 stars (5.9) | 0.9533 | 11 | 10.0 | 1.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Ykili Ross | S | 6'0, 200 | RSFr. | 4 stars (6.0) | 0.9587 | |||||||||
Jack Jones | WR/CB | 5'11, 170 | Fr. | 5 stars (6.1) | 0.9853 | |||||||||
C.J. Pollard | DB | 6'1, 185 | Fr. | 4 stars (5.8) | 0.8999 | |||||||||
Jamel Cook | DB | 6'3, 185 | Fr. | 3 stars (5.7) | 0.9526 |
8. Almost guaranteed improvement in the back
The USC pass defense was less than the sum of its parts in 2015; despite a top-25 pass rush, the Trojans ranked just 47th in Passing S&P+. But thanks to ever more injuries and shuffling, the top five tacklers in the secondary were all freshmen and sophomores. Even blue-chippers are going to battle through mistakes for a while.
Between extreme continuity (nine of 10 are back), increased experience (five of those nine are now juniors, plus one senior), and the potential upgrade in competition thanks to another batch of potential impact youngsters (sophomore Isaiah Langley, redshirt freshman Ykili Ross, freshmen Jack Jones, C.J. Pollard, and Jamel Cook), it was safe to assume USC's pass defense would improve. And that's without noting Pendergast's typically awesome pass defenses and his adaptability in defending spread offenses. But this unit has speed to burn and is far less green than it was a year ago.
Special Teams
Punter | Ht, Wt | 2016 Year |
Punts | Avg | TB | FC | I20 | FC/I20 Ratio |
Kris Albarado | 65 | 41.0 | 3 | 31 | 16 | 72.3% |
Kicker | Ht, Wt | 2016 Year |
Kickoffs | Avg | TB | OOB | TB% |
Alex Wood | 65 | 61.3 | 10 | 4 | 15.4% | ||
Matt Boermeester | 6'0, 180 | Jr. | 22 | 62.4 | 1 | 0 | 4.5% |
Place-Kicker | Ht, Wt | 2016 Year |
PAT | FG (0-39) |
Pct | FG (40+) |
Pct |
Alex Wood | 54-56 | 9-12 | 75.0% | 4-5 | 80.0% | ||
Matt Boermeester | 6'0, 180 | Jr. | 4-4 | 0-0 | N/A | 0-0 | N/A |
Returner | Pos. | Ht, Wt | 2016 Year |
Returns | Avg. | TD |
Adoree' Jackson | KR | 5'11, 185 | Jr. | 30 | 23.0 | 0 |
Justin Davis | KR | 6'1, 200 | Sr. | 11 | 19.2 | 0 |
Adoree' Jackson | PR | 5'11, 185 | Jr. | 24 | 10.5 | 2 |
Christian Tober | PR | 2 | 1.5 | 0 |
Category | Rk |
Special Teams S&P+ | 39 |
Field Goal Efficiency | 71 |
Punt Return Success Rate | 83 |
Kick Return Success Rate | 55 |
Punt Success Rate | 21 |
Kickoff Success Rate | 53 |
9. Losing solid legs
Adoree' Jackson was all-or-nothing in the return game, taking two punts for scores last year after scoring on two kick returns the year before. He had a lot of nothing returns as well, but he's as dangerous as they come.
That said, losing Kris Albarado and Alex Wood hurts. Wood was volatile -- super accurate on longer kicks but inconsistent no shorter ones -- but Albarado's punts were both high and reasonably long. Wood probably fell into the "replaceable" category, especially with his short kickoffs, but Albarado was particularly solid.
2016 Schedule & Projection Factors
2016 Schedule |
||||
Date | Opponent | Proj. S&P+ Rk | Proj. Margin | Win Probability |
3-Sep | vs. Alabama | 1 | -9.6 | 29% |
10-Sep | Utah State | 73 | 20.0 | 88% |
17-Sep | at Stanford | 16 | -1.6 | 46% |
23-Sep | at Utah | 39 | 6.0 | 64% |
1-Oct | Arizona State | 57 | 17.1 | 84% |
8-Oct | Colorado | 82 | 23.0 | 91% |
15-Oct | at Arizona | 64 | 11.1 | 74% |
27-Oct | California | 49 | 16.0 | 82% |
5-Nov | Oregon | 18 | 5.8 | 63% |
12-Nov | at Washington | 10 | -3.2 | 43% |
19-Nov | at UCLA | 12 | -2.7 | 44% |
26-Nov | Notre Dame | 11 | 4.0 | 59% |
Projected wins: 7.7 |
Five-Year F/+ Rk | 33.0% (14) |
2- and 5-Year Recruiting Rk | 2 / 2 |
2015 TO Margin / Adj. TO Margin* | 11 / 2.4 |
2015 TO Luck/Game | +3.3 |
Returning Production (Off. / Def.) | 66% (54%, 77%) |
2015 Second-order wins (difference) | 7.6 (0.4) |
Our USC blog
Our USC blog
10. No easing into this
USC will boast a new (full-time) head coach, quarterback, defensive line, and defensive coaches. This is the type of year when you want to feast on a couple of mid-major cupcakes before getting into the meat of your schedule.
Instead, the Trojans are doing the opposite. Three weeks in, USC will have already faced the defending national champion on neutral turf and the defending Pac-12 champion on the road. That would be a brutal way to start for the most experienced two-deep and coaching staff in the country.
Going by S&P+ projections, USC has a 12 percent chance of starting 3-0, a 44 percent chance of starting 2-1, a 40 percent chance of starting 1-2, and a 5 percent chance of starting 0-3. That feels optimistic, but here's your reminder that S&P+ projects USC eighth in the country.
If USC is somehow 2-1 after three games, the Trojans will probably be the Pac-12 favorite. But a 1-2 start won't be the end of the world. USC will have a lot of time to recover before a brutal three-game stretch to finish the season.
In a way, this schedule is a blessing. USC could lose three to five games while playing at a top-10 or top-15 level, and it's so blatantly tough that all but the least tolerant USC fan would probably give Helton a grace period.
I didn't love this hire. When you've got a chance at anybody in the country -- and we all seem to agree that USC could land just about anyone -- you don't have to settle for someone who went 5-4 in an extended audition. But Helton has rearranged his staff and is trying to put his own unique footprint on the program instead of tiptoeing gingerly in others' footsteps. That will give him a shot.