clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

2017 AAC football power rankings: Memphis and USF start out slightly ahead

Now that Bill’s studied every team, here’s how he stacks them up. Also, here are some charts and stuff!

NCAA Football: South Florida at Memphis Justin Ford-USA TODAY Sports

At the end of each conference previews run-through, I take a look at how I perceive the conference's balance of power heading into the season. This is in no way based on schedules, so they are not predictions. This is just how I would rank the teams after writing thousands of words about each of them. So far we’ve done the Sun Belt, C-USA, MAC, and MWC.

Bill C’s AAC power rankings

In two years of AAC title games, Temple has made it twice, and Houston and Navy have each made it once. In 2017, we could have two more first-timers facing off.

Here’s a link to every team’s data, and each team’s name below is linked to its preview.

Tier 1

1. Memphis
2. USF
3. Houston

All three of these programs have changed coaches in the last 18 months, but maybe the second-year effect gives Mike Norvell’s Memphis the edge over Charlie Strong’s USF and Major Applewhite’s Houston.

This does feel like Memphis’ time to me. The Tigers were a little bit unstable last year, but their combination of experience and upside might be the best in the conference. The secondary has question marks, but I think I like the answers, and the offense could be dynamite.

USF and Houston are obvious challengers, however. Assuming each new coaching staff clicks well with its personnel (never a given), either could make big runs.

Tier 2

4. Temple
5. Navy
6. Tulsa

These three teams could also make runs, but I feel slightly less confident. Temple’s got a lot of new defensive pieces to break in in Geoff Collins’ first season, Navy’s bend-don’t-break was far too bendy last year, and Tulsa’s defense is ... optional. Regardless, these teams are at worst a step or so behind those in Tier 1. If any made a run, it wouldn’t be particularly surprising.

Tier 3

7. SMU
8. UCF

A run from either of these teams would be a little bit surprising, but it’s not out of the realm of possibility. Chad Morris has offensive pieces assembled in his third year, and if UCF’s offense improves more than its defense regresses, Scott Frost’s UCF could be East contenders. But they have more question marks than the teams above them at this stage.

Tier 4

9. Cincinnati
10. ECU
11. Tulane
12. UConn

At least one of these four teams is going to surprise us (in a good way) this year. They’re starting down here because they have more questions than everybody else, but at least one will come up with answers. This is an exciting, deep conference in 2017 because the bottom of the league is more high-end than it has been of late.

How does S&P+ see things?

Here’s how my statistical system has the AAC laid out for 2017, with 0 equating to an average FBS team. (You can find full 2017 S&P+ projections here.)

2017 AAC projections

S&P+ is more confident in Houston and Cincinnati than I am (because S&P+ doesn’t account for coaching changes), and I’m more confident in Memphis, Navy, and Tulsa.

2017 projected standings (per S&P+)

Projected conference wins, with overall wins in parentheses.


  1. Memphis: 5.4 (8.4)
  2. Houston: 5.1 (7.8)
  3. Navy: 4.1 (6.3)
  4. Tulsa: 3.9 (5.9)
  5. SMU: 3.7 (6.0)
  6. Tulane: 2.8 (4.7)

In the MWC Mountain, no team is projected within three wins of San Diego State. In the AAC West, every team is projected within three wins of each other. Memphis has the early scheduling edge, but this could be one of the most exciting division races in college football.


  1. USF: 5.4 (8.6)
  2. Temple: 4.8 (7.5)
  3. Cincinnati: 4.4 (6.7)
  4. UCF: 4.1 (6.4)
  5. East Carolina: 2.8 (4.1)
  6. UConn: 1.6 (3.1)

There’s a bit more of a spread here, but you’ve still got four teams within 1.3 projected wins of the lead. Parity (and points), thy name is AAC.

How these teams looked in 2016

AAC 2016 S&P+ ratings

Few teams were good at both offense and defense in 2016; Temple and Houston came the closest to pulling off that balance, while USF, Navy, and Tulsa games were shootouts (and Tulane and UCF games very much were not).

AAC offenses heading into 2017

AAC offenses 2016

The range on the chart above is huge because of two outliers: USF’s big-play numbers were off the charts, and despite quarterback injury issues, Navy’s efficiency was as ridiculous as ever.

Best 2017 offensive players by team (best overall in bold):

  • Cincinnati: WR Devin Gray
  • ECU: QB Thomas Sirk
  • Houston: WR Linell Bonner
  • Memphis: WR Anthony Miller
  • Navy: FB Chris High
  • SMU: WR Courtland Sutton
  • Temple: RB Ryquell Armstead
  • Tulane: RB Dontrell Hilliard
  • Tulsa: C Chandler Miller
  • UCF: TE Jordan Akins
  • UConn: RB Arkeel Newsome
  • USF: QB Quinton Flowers

As with many conferences, it’s hard to get a good read on offensive lines because so many of last year’s all-conference guys were seniors. But it seems like every team has a thrilling running back or receiver to lean on. And USF has the quarterback Charlie Strong wishes he had at Texas.

NCAA Football: South Florida at Memphis
Quinton Flowers
Justin Ford-USA TODAY Sports

AAC defenses

AAC defenses 2016

You had a little bit of everything from AAC defenses last year — extreme bend-don’t-break units (Cincinnati, USF, UConn), all-or-nothing attacks (Tulsa), and everything in between. Temple’s was the best overall, but with a retooled front seven and new coaching, we’ll see if the Owls can stay out front.

Best 2017 defensive players by team (best overall in bold):

  • Cincinnati: DE Kevin Mouhon
  • ECU: DE Yiannis Bowden
  • Houston: DT Ed Oliver
  • Memphis: CB Jonathan Cook
  • Navy: OLB D.J. Palmore
  • SMU: DE Justin Lawler
  • Temple: SS Delvon Randall
  • Tulane: CB Donnie Lewis Jr.
  • Tulsa: DE Jesse Brubaker
  • UCF: OLB Shaquem Griffin
  • UConn: CB Jamar Summers
  • USF: LB Auggie Sanchez

Rarely do blue-chippers so immediately live up to all expectations like Ed Oliver did for Houston last year. With him slicing up the interior of opposing offensive lines for the next two years, the Cougars will struggle to not have one of the best 1-2 defenses in the conference. The questions for Houston in 2017 reside on the offensive side of the ball.

NCAA Football: Louisville at Houston
Ed Oliver (10)
Troy Taormina-USA TODAY Sports