/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/8623435/20130223_pjc_aa1_090.0.jpg)
Throughout the lockout there were quiet grumblings that among many of the discussed proposals to the new CBA, conference realignment was not one of them.
Apparently realignment talks are back on the table, and Elliotte Friedman reports that the NHL and the NHLPA have been working on a scenario with four different conferences.
At first glance this seems to be a winner, especially for the western teams. Travel for the teams in the last two conferences will be much easier and the first two conferences retain most of the divisional and regional rivalries that exist currently. The uneven numbers (two seven team divisions, two eight team divisions) could make things complicated, however.
As for playoffs, Friedman reports that the two sides are discussing a sort of wild card for the two 8-team divisions. As James Mirtle points out, it's unclear how that sort of system would work.
Not sure how you can have one conference with 16 teams and the other with 14 if eight make playoffs in both.
— James Mirtle (@mirtle) February 23, 2013
We'll have much more on this proposed realignment soon. Meanwhile, here's some instant reaction from around Twitter:
The rivalry with Detroit was fun but I'll take free points against the Thrashers every day of the week.
— Fear The Fin (@fearthefin) February 23, 2013
LOVE IT. RT @cotsonika: New realignment, via @FriedgeHNIC. Part II. pic.twitter.com/0bqNvCUQML
— Dirk Hoag (@Forechecker) February 23, 2013
Hmm, not a fan of seeing the Red Wings broken up with Chicago.
— Patrick Williams (@pwilliamsNHL) February 23, 2013
WE’RE ADDING DETROIT TO OUR FUCKING CONFERENCE FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUC
— Chemmy (@felixpotvin) February 23, 2013
More in the NHL:
• Are these the Winter Classic jerseys?
• The end of an era in Buffalo
• How reliable is NHL.com's shot tracker?
• Solving the Sharks' goal-scoring woes