BadgersPackersBrewersBucks

Were all guys who saw playing time right away, and I thought, "whoa, these guys will be amazing come Senior year" but never really saw as much improvement over 4 years as you’d have hoped. Don’t get me wrong, they’re all guys worth an NFL tryout, but i feel like where they ended their careers is a bit of a let down.

"Totally unproven against Ben Reagan " to weaknesses

But I think part of that was him taking some bad angles in pursuit. With 4.53 speed he should be able to keep up with most QBs and RBs in space if he chooses smart pursuit angles

It was AWFUL. To their credit, it’s been cleaned up a lot, but it’s still inferior to what we have now

Those are generally how NFL teams evaluate athleticism

And for most players who aren’t stars and aren’t going to play at the next level, that is fair compensation. For star players who put us in contention for titles and draw national audiences, a strong case can be made for additonal compensation. Do you think that Jonathan Taylor made UW more money than $81,000 over 3 years? Or Frank Kaminsky? Or Ron Dayne? Or even Dana Rettke? An argument can be made that these and other players deserve a slice of the revenue they generate

I don’t have much issue with anything else under "weaknesses," but being a modest athlete with a 9.61 RAS is a quite a contradiction.

Tbh, I’m surprised Bruss put up that RAS score. If that’s accurate, some team will probably talk themselves into reaching for him higher than he’d otherwise go.

An honest to goodness projected draft pick?

Beat me to it.

If I was an NFL talent scout, I’d be really hesitant to draft a CB that runs a 4.59-second forty. They have to evalutate tons of players, and I feel like that 40 time is going to cause a lot of scouts to turn the page and move on without a second look, let alone do a deep dive into his tape.